Literature DB >> 16637720

Dental esthetic self-perception in young adults with and without previous orthodontic treatment.

Eduardo Bernabé1, Valeria D Kresevic, Sandra C Cabrejos, Fernando Flores-Mir, Carlos Flores-Mir.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine which dental esthetic self-perception evaluation tool discriminated better between orthodontically treated or untreated Peruvian young adults. A total of 630 students were randomly chosen from the 2000 admitted in 2002 to a private university in Peru. Students undergoing active orthodontic treatment at the time of examination were excluded. Self-perceived dental esthetic appearance was evaluated through Standardized Continuum of Aesthetic Need, Oral Aesthetic Subjective Index Scale, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). A stepwise multivariate discriminant analysis was developed to classify orthodontic treatment according to the three evaluation tools. A total of 199 students (31.6%) reported a history of orthodontic treatment. Differences between orthodontically treated and untreated groups were found only for the mean VAS score (P < .001). Although three different approaches were used to evaluate dental esthetic self-perception, only VAS allowed the discrimination of the self-perceived dental appearance between orthodontically treated and untreated Peruvian university young adults. Similarities in the self-perceived dental appearance of treated and untreated groups reported in previous epidemiological studies could be explained because different evaluation instruments were used. Further studies are required to support current findings.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16637720     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0412:DESIYA]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  8 in total

1.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ).

Authors:  Rosaria Bucci; Roberto Rongo; Eugenio Zito; Angela Galeotti; Rosa Valletta; Vincenzo D'Antò
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Perception and attitude of Mongolians on malocclusion.

Authors:  Gannaran Narangerel; Johnson Hsin-Chung Cheng; Ganjargal Ganburged; Bolormaa Sainbayar; Tracy Yi-Hsuan Lee
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.719

3.  Perceptions of dental aesthetics of Class III and anterior open bite malocclusions: a comparison between 10- to 11-year-old schoolchildren and orthodontists.

Authors:  Ahmad Mohammad Hamdan; Vinita Singh; William Rock
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Sex differences in esthetic treatment needs in American black and white adolescent orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Edward F Harris
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Normative and self-perceived orthodontic treatment need of a Peruvian university population.

Authors:  Eduardo Bernabé; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  Comparing esthetic smile perceptions among laypersons with and without orthodontic treatment experience and dentists.

Authors:  Seong-Mu An; Sun-Young Choi; Young-Wook Chung; Tae-Ho Jang; Kyung-Hwa Kang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  Translation and validation of the Turkish version of the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire.

Authors:  Cahide Aglarci; Asli Baysal; Kadir Demirci; Ferhan Dikmen; Ali Vasfi Aglarci
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Perception of midline deviations in smile esthetics by laypersons.

Authors:  Jamille Barros Ferreira; Licínio Esmeraldo da Silva; Márcia Tereza de Oliveira Caetano; Andrea Fonseca Jardim da Motta; Adriana de Alcantara Cury-Saramago; José Nelson Mucha
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.