Literature DB >> 16637712

Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.

Zahir Altug1, Aysegul Dalkiran Arslan.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the skeletal and dentoalveolar changes achieved by a modified protractor in growing skeletal and dental Class III patients and to compare these changes with normal growth in a Class I untreated control group. The study group consisted of 25 patients (11 girls, 14 boys; mean age 11.74 +/- 1.81 years). The control group was composed of 20 patients (15 girls, five boys; mean age 11.89 +/- 1.08 years). The Class III patients were treated with a bonded acrylic cap splint type expander and a modified maxillary protractor until a positive overjet was achieved. The mean observation period was 0.65 years. Changes in study and control groups and differences between the groups were analyzed statistically. The results showed that protraction appliance produced a significant positive improvement in maxillo-mandibular relations. The forward movement of the maxilla was significant in treated Class III patients, but a slight difference was present between the two groups regarding maxillary rotation. The effective length of the maxilla was significantly increased in the Class III patients. The mandible was positioned backward, and posterior rotation of the mandible was significant in the treatment group. There was a significant increase in lower anterior facial height of treated Class III patients. The dentoalveolar measurements showed that the maxillary incisors proclined and the mandibular incisors significantly retroclined in the Class III group. A modified maxillary protractor treatment is effective for correcting skeletal Class III malocclusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16637712     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0360:SADEOA]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of the soft and hard tissue effects of two different protraction mechanisms in class III patients: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mevlut Celikoglu; Ibrahim Yavuz; Tuba Unal; Husamettin Oktay; Abdulvahit Erdem
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Skeletal Class III malocclusion with unilateral congenitally missing maxillary incisor treated by maxillary protractor and edgewise appliances.

Authors:  Masako Tabuchi; Hayato Fukuoka; Ken Miyazawa; Shigemi Goto
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Nonsurgical treatment of maxillary deficiency using tongue guard appliance: a case report.

Authors:  Farzaneh Ahrari; Neda Eslami
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2011-12-19

4.  Treatment of maxillary deficiency by miniplates: a case report.

Authors:  Rahman Showkatbakhsh; Abdolreza Jamilian; Mohammad Behnaz
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2011-05-10

5.  Displacements prediction from 3D finite element model of maxillary protraction with and without rapid maxillary expansion in a patient with unilateral cleft palate and alveolus.

Authors:  Dan Zhang; Li Zheng; Qiang Wang; Li Lu; Jia Ma
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 6.  Treatment Options for Class III Malocclusion in Growing Patients with Emphasis on Maxillary Protraction.

Authors:  Zeinab Azamian; Farinaz Shirban
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2016-04-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.