Literature DB >> 16637359

Linking direct and indirect data on dispersal: isolation by slope in a headwater stream salamander.

Winsor H Lowe1, Gene E Likens, Mark A McPeek, Don C Buso.   

Abstract

There is growing recognition of the need to incorporate information on movement behavior in landscape-scale studies of dispersal. One way to do this is by using indirect indices of dispersal (e.g., genetic differentiation) to test predictions derived from direct data on movement behavior. Mark-recapture studies documented upstream-biased movement in the salamander Gyrinophilus porphyriticus (Plethodontidae). Based on this information, we hypothesized that gene flow in G. porphyriticus is affected by the slope of the stream. Specifically, because the energy required for upstream dispersal is positively related to slope, we predicted gene flow to be negatively related to change in elevation between sampling sites. Using amplified DNA fragment length polymorphisms among tissue samples from paired sites in nine streams in the Hubbard Brook Watershed, New Hampshire, USA, we found that genetic distances between downstream and upstream sites were positively related to change in elevation over standardized 1-km distances. This pattern of isolation by slope elucidates controls on population connectivity in stream networks and underscores the potential for specific behaviors to affect the genetic structure of species at the landscape scale. More broadly, our results show the value of combining direct data on movement behavior and indirect indices to assess patterns and consequences of dispersal in spatially complex ecosystems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16637359     DOI: 10.1890/05-0232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  9 in total

1.  Landscape influences on dispersal behaviour: a theoretical model and empirical test using the fire salamander, Salamandra infraimmaculata.

Authors:  Arik Kershenbaum; Lior Blank; Iftach Sinai; Juha Merilä; Leon Blaustein; Alan R Templeton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Coexistence in streams: do source-sink dynamics allow salamanders to persist with fish predators?

Authors:  Adam J Sepulveda; Winsor H Lowe
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Population structure and landscape genetics of two endangered frog species of genus Odorrana: different scenarios on two islands.

Authors:  T Igawa; S Oumi; S Katsuren; M Sumida
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  A striking lack of genetic diversity across the wide-ranging amphibian Gastrophryne carolinensis (Anura: Microhylidae).

Authors:  Robert Makowsky; Jason Chesser; Leslie J Rissler
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Fine-scale analysis reveals cryptic landscape genetic structure in desert tortoises.

Authors:  Emily K Latch; William I Boarman; Andrew Walde; Robert C Fleischer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Watershed characteristics shape the landscape genetics of brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans) in shallow prairie lakes.

Authors:  Cory S Kremer; Steven M Vamosi; Sean M Rogers
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Modeling habitat connectivity in support of multiobjective species movement: An application to amphibian habitat systems.

Authors:  Timothy C Matisziw; Ashkan Gholamialam; Kathleen M Trauth
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Flow directionality, mountain barriers and functional traits determine diatom metacommunity structuring of high mountain streams.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Dong; Bin Li; Fengzhi He; Yuan Gu; Meiqin Sun; Haomiao Zhang; Lu Tan; Wen Xiao; Shuoran Liu; Qinghua Cai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A distance-performance trade-off in the phenotypic basis of dispersal.

Authors:  Brett R Addis; Bret W Tobalske; Jon M Davenport; Winsor H Lowe
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.912

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.