Literature DB >> 16636947

[Influence of neuromuscular blockade on the airway leak pressure of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway].

K Goldmann1, N Hoch, H Wulf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is increasingly used for surgical procedures that might require the intraoperative use of neuromuscular blocking agents. The airway seal of the PLMA depends on the interplay of the surrounding soft tissue of the neck and the cuff of the mask. An intraoperative neuromuscular blockade could lead to a decrease of the airway leak pressure (P (leak)) secondary to the relaxation of the muscles of the neck. With this study we tested the hypothesis that a neuromuscular blockade can result in a decreased P (leak) of the PLMA.
METHODS: The P (leak) of the PLMA was studied in 73 female patients under total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol (0.1 - 0.15 mg kg (-1) min (-1)) and remifentanil (0.1 - 0.3 microg kg (-1) min (-1)) before and after a complete neuromuscular blockade produced by intravenous injection of 0.6 mg kg (-1) Rocuronium.
RESULTS: The P (leak) decreased by more than 10 % of the baseline P (leak) in 8 out of 73 patients (11 %); however, in the entire study population there was no significant difference between the mean baseline P (leak) (28.5 +/- 7.3 cm H(2)O) and the mean P (leak) after complete neuromuscular blockade (29.1 +/- 7.0 cm H(2)O); (p = 0.128).
CONCLUSION: No general correlation between application of a neuromuscular blocking agent and a decrease of the mean P (leak) was found. However, the decrease of the P (leak) by more than 10 % in 11 % of the patients shows that in certain patients the application of neuromuscular blocking agents can result in a decreased P (leak) of the PLMA and indicates the necessity to control the P (leak) of the PLMA under complete muscle paralysis preoperatively when neuromuscular blocking agents are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16636947     DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-921200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther        ISSN: 0939-2661            Impact factor:   0.698


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Laryngeal masks. Possibilities and limits].

Authors:  H Hillebrand; J Motsch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Evaluation of the new supraglottic airway devices Ambu AuraOnce and Intersurgical i-gel. Positioning, sealing, patient comfort and airway morbidity].

Authors:  J F Heuer; M Stiller; J Rathgeber; C Eich; K Züchner; M Bauer; A Timmermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Comparison of the i-gel and the laryngeal mask airway proseal during general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sun Kyung Park; Geun Joo Choi; Yun Suk Choi; Eun Jin Ahn; Hyun Kang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A comparative evaluation of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, I-gel and Supreme laryngeal mask airway in adult patients undergoing elective surgery: A randomised trial.

Authors:  Anisha Singh; Anju R Bhalotra; Raktima Anand
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-11

5.  Conditions for laryngeal mask airway placement in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure: a comparison between blind insertion and laryngoscope-guided insertion.

Authors:  Go Wun Kim; Jong Yeop Kim; Soo Jin Kim; Yeo Rae Moon; Eun Jeong Park; Sung Yong Park
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Clinical performance of Ambu AuraGainTM versus i-gelTM in anesthetized children: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ji-Hyun Lee; Seungpyo Nam; Young-Eun Jang; Eun-Hee Kim; Hee-Soo Kim; Jin-Tae Kim
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)       Date:  2020-04-29

7.  Comparison of the efficacy of Macintosh laryngoscope-guided insertion of I-gel™ with the conventional blind insertion technique - A randomised study.

Authors:  Ankit Vyas; Pooja Bihani; Rishabh Jaju; Naveen Paliwal; Mathura L Tak; Usha Choudhary
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2022-06-21

8.  Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sang Yoong Park; Jong Cheol Rim; Hyuk Kim; Ji Hyeon Lee; Chan Jong Chung
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-09-30

Review 9.  Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure and clinical performance of LMA ProSeal™ and i-gel® in adults: Meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Hye Won Shin; Hae Na Yoo; Go Eun Bae; Jun Chul Chang; Min Kyung Park; Hae Seun You; Hyun Jung Kim; Hyung Sik Ahn
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 10.  Airway management guidance for the endemic phase of COVID-19.

Authors:  T M Cook; B McGuire; M Mushambi; U Misra; C Carey; N Lucas; E O'Sullivan; W Harrop-Griffiths
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 12.893

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.