Literature DB >> 16636790

The mirror antisaccade task: direction-amplitude interaction and spatial accuracy characteristics.

Ioannis Evdokimidis1, Hara Tsekou, Nikolaos Smyrnis.   

Abstract

In this study we examined the performance of human subjects in three oculomotor tasks: a visually guided saccade task (VST), a simple antisaccade task (SAT) and a mirror antisaccade task (MAT). The stimulus presentation was identical for all three tasks, and the differentiation of the tasks was based on the instruction given to the subjects. Subjects were instructed to either look at a visually presented target location (visually triggered saccade task), or to look at the opposite direction of the visually presented target (simple antisaccade task) or finally to look at the mirror location opposite to the location of the visually presented target (mirror antisaccade task). The loading of the simple antisaccade task with the addition of the amplitude requirement did not affect the percentage of directional errors but slowed down the onset of antisaccade execution by 19 ms. The amplitude of the directionally correct antisaccade in the mirror antisaccade task showed a significant distortion of the true mirror target location. This dysmetria followed the same qualitative pattern to that observed for the visually guided saccades, i.e., a near-target hypermetria together with a far-target hypometria, but both these features were exaggerated in the mirror antisaccade task. This distorted amplitude modulation of mirror antisaccade amplitude was completely lost in corrected antisaccades that followed a directional error.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16636790     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0462-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

Review 1.  A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition.

Authors:  J M Findlay; R Walker
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Planning of saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Jüri Allik; Mai Toom; Aavo Luuk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2002-09-21

3.  Effects of training on memory-guided saccade performance.

Authors:  Kristina Visscher; Elizabeth Viets; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Parallel programming of exogenous and endogenous components in the antisaccade task.

Authors:  Cristina Massen
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2004-04

5.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location.

Authors:  J Huttenlocher; L V Hedges; S Duncan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Neural cartography: sensory and motor maps in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  D L Sparks
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.808

7.  Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  J F Soechting; M Flanders
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Evidence for a range effect in the saccadic system.

Authors:  Z Kapoula
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions.

Authors:  P E Hallett
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Countermanding saccades in humans.

Authors:  D P Hanes; R H Carpenter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  12 in total

1.  Antisaccades exhibit diminished online control relative to prosaccades.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Katie Dunham; Gordon Binsted; Bryan Godbolt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Vector inversion diminishes the online control of antisaccades.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Jeffrey Weiler; Kendall Marriott; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Alternating between pro- and antisaccades: switch-costs manifest via decoupling the spatial relations between stimulus and response.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Caitlin Gillen; Ashna Samani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Anti-pointing is mediated by a perceptual bias of target location in left and right visual space.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Anika Maraj; Ashlee Gradkowski; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Stimulus-driven saccades are characterized by an invariant undershooting bias: no evidence for a range effect.

Authors:  Caitlin Gillen; Jeffrey Weiler; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The prior-antisaccade effect influences the planning and online control of prosaccades.

Authors:  Jeffrey Weiler; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Perceptual averaging governs antisaccade endpoint bias.

Authors:  Caitlin Gillen; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The antisaccade task: visual distractors elicit a location-independent planning 'cost'.

Authors:  Jesse C DeSimone; Stefan Everling; Matthew Heath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Error correcting mechanisms during antisaccades: contribution of online control during primary saccades and offline control via secondary saccades.

Authors:  Harleen Bedi; Herbert C Goltz; Agnes M F Wong; Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar; Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  No Evidence for a Saccadic Range Effect for Visually Guided and Memory-Guided Saccades in Simple Saccade-Targeting Tasks.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; Françoise Vitu; Ralf Engbert; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.