BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding the extent of meniscectomy leading to deleterious effects on tibiofemoral contact mechanics. HYPOTHESIS: The meniscus aids in optimizing tibiofemoral contact mechanics, increasing contact area, and decreasing contact stress. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees each underwent 15 separate testing conditions-5 serial 20-mm posterior medial meniscectomy conditions (intact, 50% radial width, 75% radial width, segmental, and total meniscectomy) at 3 flexion angles (0 degrees , 30 degrees , and 60 degrees )-under an 1800-N axial load. Tekscan sensors were used to measure total force and medial force, contact area, mean contact stress, and peak contact stress. RESULTS: All posterior medial meniscectomy conditions resulted in significantly decreased contact areas and increased mean and peak contact stresses compared with the intact state (P < .05). The changes in contact mechanics after segmental and total posterior medial meniscectomies were not statistically different (P > .05). Incremental changes in contact area and mean contact stress increased as more peripheral portions of the medial meniscus were removed, whereas peak contact stresses exhibited similar incremental changes throughout all meniscectomy conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The meniscus is a crucial load-bearing structure, optimizing contact area and minimizing contact stress. Loss of hoop tension (ie, segmental meniscectomy) is equivalent to total meniscectomy in load-bearing terms. The peripheral portion of the medial meniscus provides a greater contribution to increasing contact areas and decreasing mean contact stresses than does the central portion, whereas peak contact stresses increase proportionally to the amount of meniscus removed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Because the degree of meniscectomy leading to clinically significant outcomes is unknown, a prudent strategy is to preserve the greatest amount of meniscus possible.
BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding the extent of meniscectomy leading to deleterious effects on tibiofemoral contact mechanics. HYPOTHESIS: The meniscus aids in optimizing tibiofemoral contact mechanics, increasing contact area, and decreasing contact stress. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees each underwent 15 separate testing conditions-5 serial 20-mm posterior medial meniscectomy conditions (intact, 50% radial width, 75% radial width, segmental, and total meniscectomy) at 3 flexion angles (0 degrees , 30 degrees , and 60 degrees )-under an 1800-N axial load. Tekscan sensors were used to measure total force and medial force, contact area, mean contact stress, and peak contact stress. RESULTS: All posterior medial meniscectomy conditions resulted in significantly decreased contact areas and increased mean and peak contact stresses compared with the intact state (P < .05). The changes in contact mechanics after segmental and total posterior medial meniscectomies were not statistically different (P > .05). Incremental changes in contact area and mean contact stress increased as more peripheral portions of the medial meniscus were removed, whereas peak contact stresses exhibited similar incremental changes throughout all meniscectomy conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The meniscus is a crucial load-bearing structure, optimizing contact area and minimizing contact stress. Loss of hoop tension (ie, segmental meniscectomy) is equivalent to total meniscectomy in load-bearing terms. The peripheral portion of the medial meniscus provides a greater contribution to increasing contact areas and decreasing mean contact stresses than does the central portion, whereas peak contact stresses increase proportionally to the amount of meniscus removed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Because the degree of meniscectomy leading to clinically significant outcomes is unknown, a prudent strategy is to preserve the greatest amount of meniscus possible.
Authors: Andrew G Geeslin; David Civitarese; Travis Lee Turnbull; Grant J Dornan; Fernando A Fuso; Robert F LaPrade Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: G Filardo; E Kon; F Perdisa; A Sessa; A Di Martino; M Busacca; S Zaffagnini; M Marcacci Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-07-09 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Justin W Griffin; Michael M Hadeed; Brian C Werner; David R Diduch; Eric W Carson; Mark D Miller Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-02-06 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Allison G McNickle; Vincent M Wang; Elizabeth F Shewman; Brian J Cole; James M Williams Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2008-10-16 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Hongsheng Wang; Albert O Gee; Ian D Hutchinson; Kirsten Stoner; Russell F Warren; Tony O Chen; Suzanne A Maher Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2014-04-28 Impact factor: 6.202