CONTEXT: Birth weight is a bioassay for fetal insulin secretion because altered insulin secretion in utero alters insulin-mediated growth. Activating mutations in Kir6.2 are the major cause of neonatal diabetes and reduce insulin secretion by altering the closure of the beta-cell ATP-sensitive potassium channel in the presence of ATP. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine fetal and postnatal growth in patients with activating Kir6.2 mutations and identify whether this was modified by severity of mutation or maternal diabetes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used sd scores (SDS) for birth and postnatal growth in an international series of patients (n = 49) with Kir6.2 mutations and related this to their clinical phenotype. RESULTS: Birth weight was greatly reduced [-1.73 (-3.68 to 1.41), median (range) SDS], but there was postnatal catch-up because present weight was normal [-0.37 (-4.37 to 2.34) SDS]. Catch-up growth for height and weight was not seen until insulin treatment was started. Birth weight was not influenced by severity of postnatal phenotype but was increased by maternal diabetes -0.12 vs. -1.81 SDS (P = 0.037). Patients with the severe neurological developmental delay, epilepsy, and neonatal diabetes syndrome did not catch up (present weight -2.2 vs. -0.24 SDS (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Kir6.2 mutations greatly reduce fetal insulin secretion and hence fetal growth, but this is independent of mutation severity. Increased fetal growth in response to maternal diabetes suggests that either the Kir6.2 mutated fetal beta-cell is still glucose responsive or there is a non-insulin-mediated increase in fetal growth. Postnatal catch-up requires insulin treatment but is complete, except in those with epilepsy.
CONTEXT: Birth weight is a bioassay for fetal insulin secretion because altered insulin secretion in utero alters insulin-mediated growth. Activating mutations in Kir6.2 are the major cause of neonatal diabetes and reduce insulin secretion by altering the closure of the beta-cell ATP-sensitive potassium channel in the presence of ATP. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine fetal and postnatal growth in patients with activating Kir6.2 mutations and identify whether this was modified by severity of mutation or maternal diabetes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used sd scores (SDS) for birth and postnatal growth in an international series of patients (n = 49) with Kir6.2 mutations and related this to their clinical phenotype. RESULTS: Birth weight was greatly reduced [-1.73 (-3.68 to 1.41), median (range) SDS], but there was postnatal catch-up because present weight was normal [-0.37 (-4.37 to 2.34) SDS]. Catch-up growth for height and weight was not seen until insulin treatment was started. Birth weight was not influenced by severity of postnatal phenotype but was increased by maternal diabetes -0.12 vs. -1.81 SDS (P = 0.037). Patients with the severe neurological developmental delay, epilepsy, and neonatal diabetes syndrome did not catch up (present weight -2.2 vs. -0.24 SDS (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS:Kir6.2 mutations greatly reduce fetal insulin secretion and hence fetal growth, but this is independent of mutation severity. Increased fetal growth in response to maternal diabetes suggests that either the Kir6.2 mutated fetal beta-cell is still glucose responsive or there is a non-insulin-mediated increase in fetal growth. Postnatal catch-up requires insulin treatment but is complete, except in those with epilepsy.
Authors: E A Andersson; K Pilgaard; C Pisinger; M N Harder; N Grarup; K Faerch; P Poulsen; D R Witte; T Jørgensen; A Vaag; T Hansen; O Pedersen Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2010-05-20 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Nele Myngheer; Karel Allegaert; Andrew Hattersley; Tim McDonald; Holger Kramer; Frances M Ashcroft; Johan Verhaeghe; Chantal Mathieu; Kristina Casteels Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Rachel M Freathy; Michael N Weedon; Amanda Bennett; Elina Hypponen; Caroline L Relton; Beatrice Knight; Beverley Shields; Kirstie S Parnell; Christopher J Groves; Susan M Ring; Marcus E Pembrey; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; David P Strachan; Chris Power; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin; Mark I McCarthy; George Davey Smith; Andrew T Hattersley; Timothy M Frayling Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2007-04-23 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Ewan R Pearson; Sylvia F Boj; Anna M Steele; Timothy Barrett; Karen Stals; Julian P Shield; Sian Ellard; Jorge Ferrer; Andrew T Hattersley Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Rachel M Freathy; Amanda J Bennett; Susan M Ring; Beverley Shields; Christopher J Groves; Nicholas J Timpson; Michael N Weedon; Eleftheria Zeggini; Cecilia M Lindgren; Hana Lango; John R B Perry; Anneli Pouta; Aimo Ruokonen; Elina Hyppönen; Chris Power; Paul Elliott; David P Strachan; Marjo-Riitta Järvelin; George Davey Smith; Mark I McCarthy; Timothy M Frayling; Andrew T Hattersley Journal: Diabetes Date: 2009-02-19 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Christophe A Girard; F Thomas Wunderlich; Kenju Shimomura; Stephan Collins; Stephan Kaizik; Peter Proks; Fernando Abdulkader; Anne Clark; Vicky Ball; Lejla Zubcevic; Liz Bentley; Rebecca Clark; Chris Church; Alison Hugill; Juris Galvanovskis; Roger Cox; Patrik Rorsman; Jens C Brüning; Frances M Ashcroft Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2008-12-08 Impact factor: 14.808