Literature DB >> 16635601

Primary and rescue percutaneous coronary intervention with paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Jon-David Reid Schwalm1, Mayraj Ahmad, James L Velianou, Changchun Xie, Madhu K Natarajan.   

Abstract

We conducted a retrospective comparison of paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs, n = 60) versus bare metal stents (BMSs, n = 137) in consecutive patients who underwent primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention over 1 year. The PES cohort had no in-stent thromboses and had a 65% (p = 0.02) decrease in the combined end point of death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization at 1 year compared with the BMS group. PES implantation appears to be safe and possibly superior to BMS implantation in terms of 1-year major cardiovascular outcomes in the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16635601     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.11.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  1 in total

1.  Comparison of one-year clinical outcomes with paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in everyday practice.

Authors:  Mayraj Ahmad; Jon-David R Schwalm; James L Velianou; Dan Pericak; Madhu K Natarajan
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.223

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.