Literature DB >> 16634836

Myocardial perfusion in patients with typical chest pain and normal angiogram.

S Graf1, A Khorsand, M Gwechenberger, M Schütz, K Kletter, H Sochor, R Dudczak, G Maurer, C Pirich, G Porenta, M Zehetgruber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 10-30% of patients with typical chest pain present normal epicardial coronaries. In a proportion of these patients, angina is attributed to microvascular dysfunction. Previous studies investigating whether angina is the result of abnormal resting or stress perfusion are controversial but limited by varying inclusion criteria. Therefore, we investigated whether microvascular dysfunction in these patients is associated with perfusion abnormalities at rest or at stress. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 58 patients (39 female, 19 male, mean age 58+/-10 years) with angina and normal angiogram as well as 10 control patients with atypical chest pain and normal coronaries (six female, four male, mean age 53+/-11 years) myocardial blood flow (MBF) was measured at rest and under dipyridamole using 13N-ammonia PET. Resting MBF and coronary flow reserve (CFR) as the ratio of hyperaemic to resting MBF were corrected for rate-pressure-product (RPP): normalized resting MBF (MBFn)=MBFx10,000/RPP and CFRn=CFRxRPP/10,000.
RESULTS: Sixteen/58 patients had a normal CFRn (=2.5; group I; CFRn: 3.1+/-0.88); the same as the controls (CFRn: 3.3+/-0.74). Forty-two/58 patients presented a reduced CFRn (group II; CFRn: 1.78+/-0.57). Group II had both a higher MBFn (group II: 1.30+/-0.33 vs. Group I: 1.03+/-0.26; P<0.05 and vs. controls: 1.07+/-0.19; P<0.01) and a lower hyperaemic MBF (group II: 2.25+/-0.76 mL g-1 min-1 vs. Group I: 3.07+/-0.78 mL g-1 min-1; P<0.001 and vs. controls: 3.41+/-0.94 mL g-1 min-1; P<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Impaired CFRn in patients with typical angina and normal angiogram is owing to both an increased resting and reduced hyperaemic MBF. Therefore, PET represents a prerequisite for further studies to optimize treatment in individuals with anginal pain and normal coronary angiogram.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16634836     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2006.01635.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0014-2972            Impact factor:   4.686


  9 in total

1.  Combining dynamic and ECG-gated ⁸²Rb-PET for practical implementation in the clinic.

Authors:  George A Sayre; Stephen L Bacharach; Michael W Dae; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.690

2.  Assessment of coronary flow reserve by sestamibi imaging in patients with typical chest pain and normal coronary arteries.

Authors:  Giovanni Storto; Anna Rita Sorrentino; Teresa Pellegrino; Raffaele Liuzzi; Mario Petretta; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Measurement of coronary flow reserve by noninvasive cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Alberto Cuocolo; Mario Petretta; Andrea Soricelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Increased wave reflection and ejection duration in women with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease: ancillary study from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation.

Authors:  Wilmer W Nichols; Scott J Denardo; B Delia Johnson; Barry L Sharaf; C Noel Bairey Merz; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 5.  Assessment of coronary flow reserve using single photon emission computed tomography with technetium 99m-labeled tracers.

Authors:  Mario Petretta; Andrea Soricelli; Giovanni Storto; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Association between anxiety disorder and the extent of ischemia observed in cardiac syndrome X.

Authors:  I A C Vermeltfoort; P G H M Raijmakers; D A M Odekerken; A F M Kuijper; A Zwijnenburg; G J J Teule
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Evaluation of non-invasive imaging parameters in coronary microvascular disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  F Groepenhoff; R G M Klaassen; G B Valstar; S H Bots; N C Onland-Moret; H M Den Ruijter; T Leiner; A L M Eikendal
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 8.  Prevalence of Coronary Microvascular Disease and Coronary Vasospasm in Patients With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Niya Mileva; Sakura Nagumo; Takuya Mizukami; Jeroen Sonck; Colin Berry; Emanuele Gallinoro; Giovanni Monizzi; Alessandro Candreva; Daniel Munhoz; Dobrin Vassilev; Martin Penicka; Emanuele Barbato; Bernard De Bruyne; Carlos Collet
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 6.106

Review 9.  Quantitative cardiac positron emission tomography: the time is coming!

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2012-08-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.