Literature DB >> 16634173

Research misconduct and crime lessons from criminal science on preventing misconduct and promoting integrity.

Douglas Adams1, Kenneth D Pimple.   

Abstract

For 200 years, criminologists theorized that delinquent and criminal acts arise from deviant psychological states (such as irrationality or immorality) and/or social conditions that produce these psychological states. This theoretical perspective, which is being duplicated in most efforts to understand and control research misconduct, has not been productive. More recently, criminological perspectives have emerged, emphasizing situational factors that enhance or restrict the opportunity for illegal or imprudent behavior. These so-called "opportunity" theories have been shown to have practical value in reducing crime rates. We explore the promise of these newer theories for the responsible conduct of research (RCR).

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16634173     DOI: 10.1080/08989620500217495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Account Res        ISSN: 0898-9621            Impact factor:   2.622


  8 in total

Review 1.  Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: prevalence and causal factors.

Authors:  Stephen L George
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Data fraud in clinical trials.

Authors:  Stephen L George; Marc Buyse
Journal:  Clin Investig (Lond)       Date:  2015

3.  Mentoring and research misconduct: an analysis of research mentoring in closed ORI cases.

Authors:  David E Wright; Sandra L Titus; Jered B Cornelison
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Teaching and Assessing the Responsible Conduct of Research: A Delphi Consensus Panel Report.

Authors:  James M Dubois; Jeffrey M Dueker
Journal:  J Res Adm       Date:  2009

5.  "Positive" results increase down the Hierarchy of the Sciences.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Understanding research misconduct: a comparative analysis of 120 cases of professional wrongdoing.

Authors:  James M DuBois; Emily E Anderson; John Chibnall; Kelly Carroll; Tyler Gibb; Chiji Ogbuka; Timothy Rubbelke
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Life after Misconduct: Promoting Rehabilitation while Minimizing Damage.

Authors:  Janet D Stemwedel
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2014-12-15

8.  Survey study of research integrity officers' perceptions of research practices associated with instances of research misconduct.

Authors:  Michael Kalichman
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2020-12-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.