Literature DB >> 16634082

Sensitivity of alveolar macrophages to substrate mechanical and adhesive properties.

Sophie Féréol1, Redouane Fodil, Béatrice Labat, Stéphane Galiacy, Valérie M Laurent, Bruno Louis, Daniel Isabey, Emmanuelle Planus.   

Abstract

In order to understand the sensitivity of alveolar macrophages (AMs) to substrate properties, we have developed a new model of macrophages cultured on substrates of increasing Young's modulus: (i) a monolayer of alveolar epithelial cells representing the supple (approximately 0.1 kPa) physiological substrate, (ii) polyacrylamide gels with two concentrations of bis-acrylamide representing low and high intermediate stiffness (respectively 40 kPa and 160 kPa) and, (iii) a highly rigid surface of plastic or glass (respectively 3 MPa and 70 MPa), the two latter being or not functionalized with type I-collagen. The macrophage response was studied through their shape (characterized by 3D-reconstructions of F-actin structure) and their cytoskeletal stiffness (estimated by transient twisting of magnetic RGD-coated beads and corrected for actual bead immersion). Macrophage shape dramatically changed from rounded to flattened as substrate stiffness increased from soft ((i) and (ii)) to rigid (iii) substrates, indicating a net sensitivity of alveolar macrophages to substrate stiffness but without generating F-actin stress fibers. Macrophage stiffness was also increased by large substrate stiffness increase but this increase was not due to an increase in internal tension assessed by the negligible effect of a F-actin depolymerizing drug (cytochalasine D) on bead twisting. The mechanical sensitivity of AMs could be partly explained by an idealized numerical model describing how low cell height enhances the substrate-stiffness-dependence of the apparent (measured) AM stiffness. Altogether, these results suggest that macrophages are able to probe their physical environment but the mechanosensitive mechanism behind appears quite different from tissue cells, since it occurs at no significant cell-scale prestress, shape changes through minimal actin remodeling and finally an AMs stiffness not affected by the loss in F-actin integrity. Copyright 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16634082     DOI: 10.1002/cm.20130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton        ISSN: 0886-1544


  38 in total

1.  The effects of substrate stiffness on the in vitro activation of macrophages and in vivo host response to poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogels.

Authors:  Anna K Blakney; Mark D Swartzlander; Stephanie J Bryant
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.396

2.  Dynamics of podosome stiffness revealed by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Anna Labernadie; Christophe Thibault; Christophe Vieu; Isabelle Maridonneau-Parini; Guillaume M Charrière
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Prestress and adhesion site dynamics control cell sensitivity to extracellular stiffness.

Authors:  S Féréol; R Fodil; V M Laurent; M Balland; B Louis; G Pelle; S Hénon; E Planus; D Isabey
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Kindlin3 regulates biophysical properties and mechanics of membrane to cortex attachment.

Authors:  Tejasvi Dudiki; Gautam Mahajan; Huan Liu; Irina Zhevlakova; Chase Bertagnolli; Daniel W Nascimento; Chandrasekhar R Kothapalli; Tatiana V Byzova
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 5.  Monocytes and macrophages in tissue repair: Implications for immunoregenerative biomaterial design.

Authors:  Molly E Ogle; Claire E Segar; Sraeyes Sridhar; Edward A Botchwey
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-05

6.  Substrate elasticity regulates the behavior of human monocyte-derived macrophages.

Authors:  Katrina M Adlerz; Helim Aranda-Espinoza; Heather N Hayenga
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 1.733

7.  Fibronectin-based isolation of valve interstitial cell subpopulations: relevance to valve disease.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Stephens; Thanh N Huynh; Jennifer D Cieluch; K Jane Grande-Allen
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.396

8.  Proliferation and Recruitment Contribute to Myocardial Macrophage Expansion in Chronic Heart Failure.

Authors:  Hendrik B Sager; Maarten Hulsmans; Kory J Lavine; Marina B Moreira; Timo Heidt; Gabriel Courties; Yuan Sun; Yoshiko Iwamoto; Benoit Tricot; Omar F Khan; James E Dahlman; Anna Borodovsky; Kevin Fitzgerald; Daniel G Anderson; Ralph Weissleder; Peter Libby; Filip K Swirski; Matthias Nahrendorf
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  An inverted dielectrophoretic device for analysis of attached single cell mechanics.

Authors:  Rebecca Lownes Urbano; Alisa Morss Clyne
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 6.799

10.  Non-linear elasticity of extracellular matrices enables contractile cells to communicate local position and orientation.

Authors:  Jessamine P Winer; Shaina Oake; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.