Literature DB >> 16632617

Initial experiences of using an automated volumetric measure of breast density: the standard mammogram form.

M Jeffreys1, R Warren, R Highnam, G Davey Smith.   

Abstract

Limitations of area based measures of breast density have led several research groups to develop volumetric measures of breast density, for use in predicting risk and in epidemiological research. In this paper, we describe our initial experiences using an automated algorithm (standard mammogram form, SMF) to estimate the volume of the breast that is dense from digitized film mammograms. We performed analyses on 3816 mammograms of 626 women, who were part of the Glasgow Alumni Cohort and had mammograms taken within the Scottish Breast Screening Programme between 1989 and 2002. Absolute volume of dense breast tissue (SMF volume) and the percentage of the volume of the breast that is dense (SMF%) were calculated. The median (interquartile range) of SMF volume was 66 cm3 (48 to 98), and of SMF% was 23.4% (18.6 to 29.7). SMF%, but not SMF volume, was positively related to a six category classification (SCC) of visually assigned area-based breast density (increase in ln(SMF%) per category increase in SCC: 0.04% (95% CI: 0.03-0.05). The SMF algorithm produced lower SMF volume for craniocaudal (CC) compared with mediolateral oblique (MLO) views, but CC/MLO differences for SMF% were small. The mean right/left difference for ln(SMF volume) was -0.027 cm3 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.044 to -0.009) and of ln(SMF%) was 0.005% (95% CI -0.008% to 0.019%). We present these initial data as a background for future analytical work using SMF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16632617     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/24769358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  15 in total

1.  X-ray absorptiometry of the breast using mammographic exposure factors: application to units featuring automatic beam quality selection.

Authors:  C J Kotre
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast composition descriptors: automated measurement development for full field digital mammography.

Authors:  E E Fowler; T A Sellers; B Lu; J J Heine
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Screen-film mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a comparison of the volumetric standard mammogram form and the interactive threshold measurement methods.

Authors:  Zoe Aitken; Valerie A McCormack; Ralph P Highnam; Lisa Martin; Anoma Gunasekara; Olga Melnichouk; Gord Mawdsley; Chris Peressotti; Martin Yaffe; Norman F Boyd; Isabel dos Santos Silva
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Comparison of mammographic density assessed as volumes and areas among women undergoing diagnostic image-guided breast biopsy.

Authors:  Gretchen L Gierach; Berta M Geller; John A Shepherd; Deesha A Patel; Pamela M Vacek; Donald L Weaver; Rachael E Chicoine; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Bo Fan; Amir Pasha Mahmoudzadeh; Jeff Wang; Jason M Johnson; Sally D Herschorn; Louise A Brinton; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  A quantitative description of the percentage of breast density measurement using full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  John J Heine; Ke Cao; Dana E Rollison; Gail Tiffenberg; Jerry A Thomas
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Breast percent density: estimation on digital mammograms and central tomosynthesis projections.

Authors:  Predrag R Bakic; Ann-Katherine Carton; Despina Kontos; Cuiping Zhang; Andrea B Troxel; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Automated Percentage of Breast Density Measurements for Full-field Digital Mammography Applications.

Authors:  Erin E E Fowler; Celine M Vachon; Christopher G Scott; Thomas A Sellers; John J Heine
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Feasibility study of a breast density measurement within a direct photon-counting mammography scanner system.

Authors:  Youichi Machida; Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Tamiko Yoshida; Ai Saita; Mari Yakabe; Kanae Nii
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 2.374

9.  Effective radiation attenuation calibration for breast density: compression thickness influences and correction.

Authors:  John J Heine; Ke Cao; Jerry A Thomas
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Comparison of a new and existing method of mammographic density measurement: intramethod reliability and associations with known risk factors.

Authors:  Valerie A McCormack; Ralph Highnam; Nicholas Perry; Isabel dos Santos Silva
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.