Literature DB >> 16632615

Acute adverse reactions to magnetic resonance contrast media--gadolinium chelates.

A Li1, C S Wong, M K Wong, C M Lee, M C Au Yeung.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical safety of intravenous gadolinium-based contrast media used in patients who underwent MRI at a single institution. Acute adverse reactions to intravenous gadolinium-based contrast media used for MRI at the Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR, from January 1999 to November 2004 were recorded in an incidence log book. The medical records of patients' demographics were retrospectively reviewed and the nature, frequency and severity of the adverse reactions were investigated and documented. The incidence of acute adverse reactions to intravenous gadolinium-based contrast media was 0.48% (45 patients with 46 adverse reactions). The severity of these adverse reactions were 96% mild, 2% moderate (one patient developed shortness of breath that required oxygen supplementation and intravenous steroidal management) and 2% severe (one patient developed an anaphylactoid reaction, but successfully recovered through timely resuscitation). No patients were recorded as having contrast extravasation and none died as a result of any adverse reaction. Among the 45 patients who developed adverse reactions, three patients (6.7%) had prior adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media, three (6.7%) had prior reactions to a different gadolinium-based contrast agent, one (2%) had asthma and nine (20%) had a history of drug/food allergy. Overall, 41% of the adverse reactions were not documented in the final MRI report or the clinical medical records. Gadolinium-based contrast media are safe and well tolerated by the vast majority of patients. In our study, the adverse reaction rate (0.48%) and the incidence of severe anaphylactoid reaction (0.01%) concur with those reported in the literature. Although most of the symptoms are mild and transient, these adverse reactions must be accurately documented and managed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16632615     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/88469693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  36 in total

1.  Is there a role for free breathing non-contrast steady-state free precession renal MRA imaging for assessing live donors? A preliminary study.

Authors:  I Laurence; B Ariff; R A Quest; S Moser; A Glover; D Taube; P Gishen; V Papalois; C Juli
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  [Complications due to contrast agent administration: what has been confirmed in prevention?].

Authors:  E Schönenberger; M Mühler; M Dewey
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  Evaluation of adverse reactions to contrast media in the hospital.

Authors:  E-J Kyung; J-H Ryu; E-Y Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Gadolinium contrast agents for CNS imaging: current concepts and clinical evidence.

Authors:  E Kanal; K Maravilla; H A Rowley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Imaging features of vertebral artery fenestration.

Authors:  Adam D'Sa; Matthew D Alvin; Ryan Brody; Samrah Javed; Scott Faro; Rohini N Nadgir
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Imaging techniques in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic carcinoma as a result of colon cancer.

Authors:  Elmar M Merkle; Janio Szklaruk; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2010-08

Review 9.  Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked technical questions.

Authors:  Marco Essig; Mark S Shiroishi; Thanh Binh Nguyen; Marc Saake; James M Provenzale; David Enterline; Nicoletta Anzalone; Arnd Dörfler; Alex Rovira; Max Wintermark; Meng Law
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Safety in magnetic resonance units: an update.

Authors:  P A Farling; P A Flynn; G Darwent; J De Wilde; D Grainger; S King; M E McBrien; D K Menon; J P Ridgway; M Sury; J Thornton; S R Wilson
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.