Literature DB >> 16631984

Prospective multicenter study of quantitative pretest probability assessment to exclude acute coronary syndrome for patients evaluated in emergency department chest pain units.

Alice M Mitchell1, J Lee Garvey, Abhinav Chandra, Deborah Diercks, Charles V Pollack, Jeffrey A Kline.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We compare the diagnostic accuracy of 3 methods--attribute matching, physician's written unstructured estimate, and a logistic regression formula (Acute Coronary Insufficiency-Time Insensitive Predictive Instrument, ACI-TIPI)--of estimating a very low pretest probability (< or = 2%) for acute coronary syndromes in emergency department (ED) patients evaluated in chest pain units.
METHODS: We prospectively studied 1,114 consecutive patients from 3 academic EDs, evaluated for acute coronary syndrome. Physicians collected data required for pretest probability assessment before protocol-driven chest pain unit testing. A pretest probability greater than 2% was considered "test positive." The criterion standard was the outcome of acute coronary syndrome (death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, or > 60% stenosis prompting new treatment) within 45 days, adjudicated by 3 independent reviewers.
RESULTS: Fifty-one of 1,114 enrolled patients (4.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.4% to 6.0%) developed acute coronary syndrome within 45 days, including 4 of 991 (0.4%; 95% CI 0.1% to 1.0%) patients, discharged after a negative chest pain unit evaluation result, who developed acute coronary syndrome. Unstructured estimate identified 293 patients with pretest probability less than or equal to 2%, 2 had acute coronary syndrome, yielding sensitivity of 96.1% (95% CI 86.5% to 99.5%) and specificity of 27.4% (95% CI 24.7% to 30.2%). Attribute matching identified 304 patients with pretest probability less than or equal to 2%; 1 had acute coronary syndrome, yielding a sensitivity of 98.0% (95% CI 89.6% to 99.9%) and a specificity of 26.1% (95% CI 23.6% to 28.7%). ACI-TIPI identified 56 patients; none had acute coronary syndrome, yielding sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 93.0% to 100%) and specificity of 6.1% (95% CI 4.7% to 7.9%).
CONCLUSION: In a low-risk ED population with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome, patients with a quantitative pretest probability less than or equal to 2%, determined by attribute matching, unstructured estimate, or logistic regression, may not require additional diagnostic testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16631984     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  18 in total

1.  Cost burden of non-specific chest pain admissions.

Authors:  J Groarke; J O'Brien; G Go; M Susanto; P Owens; A O Maree
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Outcomes research in cardiovascular imaging: report of a workshop sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Authors:  Pamela S Douglas; Allen Taylor; Diane Bild; Robert Bonow; Philip Greenland; Michael Lauer; Frank Peacock; James Udelson
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  Opportunities for Patient Matching Algorithms to Improve Patient Care in Oncology.

Authors:  Travis Johnson; David Liebner; James L Chen
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2017-11

4.  Critical pathways for post-emergency outpatient diagnosis and treatment: tools to improve the value of emergency care.

Authors:  Jeremiah D Schuur; Christopher W Baugh; Erik P Hess; Joshua A Hilton; Jesse M Pines; Brent R Asplin
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 5.  Shared Decision-Making as the Future of Emergency Cardiology.

Authors:  Marc A Probst; Peter A Noseworthy; Juan P Brito; Erik P Hess
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  Efficacy of High-Sensitivity Troponin T in Identifying Very-Low-Risk Patients With Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  W Frank Peacock; Brigette M Baumann; Deborah Bruton; Thomas E Davis; Beverly Handy; Christopher W Jones; Judd E Hollander; Alexander T Limkakeng; Abhi Mehrotra; Martin Than; Andre Ziegler; Carina Dinkel
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 14.676

7.  Outcomes research in cardiovascular imaging: report of a workshop sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Authors:  Pamela S Douglas; Allen Taylor; Diane Bild; Robert Bonow; Philip Greenland; Michael Lauer; Frank Peacock; James Udelson
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-07

8.  The Chest Pain Choice trial: a pilot randomized trial of a decision aid for patients with chest pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  Meghan A Pierce; Erik P Hess; Jeffrey A Kline; Nilay D Shah; Maggie Breslin; Megan E Branda; Laurie J Pencille; Brent R Asplin; David M Nestler; Annie T Sadosty; Ian G Stiell; Henry H Ting; Victor M Montori
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Prognostic utility of the acute cardiac ischemia time-insensitive predictive instrument (ACI-TIPI).

Authors:  Jonathan S Ilgen; Alex F Manini; Udo Hoffmann; Vicki E Noble; Ediza Giraldez; Supapan Nualpring; J Stephen Bohan
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-07-31

10.  Self-reported cocaine use, emergency physician testing and outcomes in suspected acute coronary syndromes: a nested matched case-control study.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Christopher J Lindsell; Charles V Pollack; Judd Hollander; Deborah B Diercks; J Douglas Kirk; Venkataraman Anantharaman; W Brian Gibler; James Hoekstra; W Frank Peacock
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.