Literature DB >> 16631652

Trends in emergency coronary artery bypass grafting after percutaneous coronary intervention, 1994-2003.

Constance K Haan1, Sean O'Brien, Fred H Edwards, Eric D Peterson, T Bruce Ferguson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has undergone profound changes in techniques used to achieve revascularization and in patient selection. We examine trends in emergency surgical revascularization after PCI.
METHODS: Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Surgery Database, we examined patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting within 6 hours of PCI from 1994 to 2003. Stratifying into groups of patients who had and had not suffered myocardial infarction within 24 hours of PCI followed by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), we tracked trends in characteristics, predicted risk, and clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: The proportion of isolated CABG procedures done emergently after PCI decreased over 1994 to 1999 from 3,357 of 115,679 (2.9%) to 1,227 of 155,831 (0.8%), remaining stable through 2003. Those suffering myocardial infarction within 24 hours made up a constant proportion of isolated CABG as emergency after PCI (3,352 of 1,042,864; 0.3%) since 1997. Over the decade, the preoperative risk profile worsened, including more elderly patients and more with cerebrovascular disease and congestive heart failure. Operative mortality among these patients has risen with time (from 8.0% to 9.3%; p < 0.0001 for trend), particularly in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (from 14.1% to 16.6%; p < 0.0001 for trend). Similarly, postoperative complications have increased over time, most notably seen in the need for reoperation (10.62% to 24.56%), prolonged postoperative ventilation (25.65% to 54.58%), and renal failure (10.22% to 18.55%).
CONCLUSIONS: In 2005, there remains a low but real need for emergent CABG after PCI, in which operative outcomes are less than ideal, especially in the postinfarction patient, representing an area for cross-specialty collaboration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16631652     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.09.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

1.  PCI with or without surgical standby.

Authors:  Gianluigi Bisleri; Tomaso Bottio; Claudio Muneretto; Nicola Berlinghieri
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Percutaneous coronary interventions in facilities without cardiac surgery on site.

Authors:  Yuri B Pride; C Michael Gibson
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Immediate rescue operations after failed diagnostic or therapeutic cardiac catheterization procedures.

Authors:  Sven M Almdahl; Terje Veel; Per Halvorsen; Stein E Rynning
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-05-10

4.  The role of invasive therapies in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  José C Nicolau; Pedro A Lemos; Maurício Wajngarten; Roberto R Giraldez; Carlos V Serrano; Eulógio E Martinez; Luciano M Baracioli; Roberto Kalil; Fábio B Jatene; Luis A Dallan; Luis B Puig; Noedir A Stolf
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  Revascularisation of left main stem disease: a prospective analysis of modern practice and outcomes in a non-surgical centre.

Authors:  J J Coughlan; Nial Blake; Napohn Chongprasertpon; Munir Ibrahim; Samer Arnous; Thomas John Kiernan
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2018-07-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.