BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive decline after cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may be caused in part by highly prothrombotic atheroemboli to the brain; the source of these emboli is likely the ascending aorta and aortic arch. We examined transcerebral platelet activation gradients using simultaneous measurements in arterial and jugular venous blood and then compared gradients with post-CPB-associated neurocognitive injury. METHODS: Eighty-one patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery requiring CPB were studied. Neurocognitive function was measured preoperatively and again at 6 weeks postoperatively. Paired arterial and jugular venous blood samples were drawn before surgery, immediately before and after aortic cross-clamp removal (an event previously linked to embolic showers), and at the end of the operation. Transcerebral platelet activation gradients (venous minus arterial values) were compared in patients with and without cognitive deficit. RESULTS: Immediately after aortic cross-clamp removal, there was a significant increase in the transcerebral platelet activation gradient (increased % P-selectin-positive platelets during transcerebral passage) in the subset of patients who subsequently developed post-CPB cognitive deficit; this platelet activation gradient did not occur in patients without cognitive injury. In contrast, there was no transcerebral gradient of platelet activation in CPB patients as an entirety, nor was there a gradient at all other time points in the patient subset who went on to have cognitive deficit develop. This fleeting gradient of transcerebral platelet activation after cross-clamp removal was also significantly correlated with the overall change in cognitive injury score. CONCLUSIONS: Transient intracerebral platelet activation after removal of the aortic cross-clamp is associated with post-CPB neurocognitive injury.
BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive decline after cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may be caused in part by highly prothrombotic atheroemboli to the brain; the source of these emboli is likely the ascending aorta and aortic arch. We examined transcerebral platelet activation gradients using simultaneous measurements in arterial and jugular venous blood and then compared gradients with post-CPB-associated neurocognitive injury. METHODS: Eighty-one patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery requiring CPB were studied. Neurocognitive function was measured preoperatively and again at 6 weeks postoperatively. Paired arterial and jugular venous blood samples were drawn before surgery, immediately before and after aortic cross-clamp removal (an event previously linked to embolic showers), and at the end of the operation. Transcerebral platelet activation gradients (venous minus arterial values) were compared in patients with and without cognitive deficit. RESULTS: Immediately after aortic cross-clamp removal, there was a significant increase in the transcerebral platelet activation gradient (increased % P-selectin-positive platelets during transcerebral passage) in the subset of patients who subsequently developed post-CPB cognitive deficit; this platelet activation gradient did not occur in patients without cognitive injury. In contrast, there was no transcerebral gradient of platelet activation in CPB patients as an entirety, nor was there a gradient at all other time points in the patient subset who went on to have cognitive deficit develop. This fleeting gradient of transcerebral platelet activation after cross-clamp removal was also significantly correlated with the overall change in cognitive injury score. CONCLUSIONS: Transient intracerebral platelet activation after removal of the aortic cross-clamp is associated with post-CPB neurocognitive injury.
Authors: Rebecca Y Klinger; Mary Cooter; Miles Berger; Mihai V Podgoreanu; Mark Stafford-Smith; Thomas L Ortel; Ian J Welsby; Jerrold H Levy; Henry M Rinder; Mark F Newman; Joseph P Mathew Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 5.063
Authors: John Gunstad; Andreana Benitez; Karin F Hoth; Mary Beth Spitznagel; Jeanne McCaffery; John McGeary; Lynn S Kakos; Athena Poppas; Robert H Paul; Angela L Jefferson; Lawrence H Sweet; Ronald A Cohen Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-07-09 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Lawrence L Horstman; Wenche Jy; Yeon S Ahn; Robert Zivadinov; Amir H Maghzi; Masoud Etemadifar; J Steven Alexander; Alireza Minagar Journal: J Neuroinflammation Date: 2010-02-03 Impact factor: 8.322
Authors: Joseph P Mathew; William D White; David B Schinderle; Mihai V Podgoreanu; Miles Berger; Carmelo A Milano; Daniel T Laskowitz; Mark Stafford-Smith; James A Blumenthal; Mark F Newman Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-10-08 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Monique T Fontes; R Cameron Swift; Barbara Phillips-Bute; Mihai V Podgoreanu; Mark Stafford-Smith; Mark F Newman; Joseph P Mathew Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: David L McDonagh; Miles Berger; Joseph P Mathew; Carmelo Graffagnino; Carmelo A Milano; Mark F Newman Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Monique T Fontes; David L McDonagh; Barbara Phillips-Bute; Ian J Welsby; Mihai V Podgoreanu; Manuel L Fontes; Mark Stafford-Smith; Mark F Newman; Joseph P Mathew Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 2.628
Authors: Christoph Tschuor; Lars M Asmis; Philipp M Lenzlinger; Martina Tanner; Luc Härter; Marius Keel; Reto Stocker; John F Stover Journal: Crit Care Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Danielle Greaves; Peter J Psaltis; Daniel H J Davis; Tyler J Ross; Erica S Ghezzi; Amit Lampit; Ashleigh E Smith; Hannah A D Keage Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-11-07 Impact factor: 6.106