Literature DB >> 16631233

Mercury accumulation in grass and forb species as a function of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations and mercury exposures in air and soil.

A G Millhollen1, D Obrist, M S Gustin.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to investigate the potential for atmospheric Hg degrees uptake by grassland species as a function of different air and soil Hg exposures, and to specifically test how increasing atmospheric CO(2) concentrations may influence foliar Hg concentrations. Four common tallgrass prairie species were germinated and grown for 7 months in environmentally controlled chambers using two different atmospheric elemental mercury (Hg major; 3.7+/-2.0 and 10.2+/-3.5 ng m(-3)), soil Hg (<0.01 and 0.15+/-0.08 micro g g(-1)), and atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO(2)) (390+/-18, 598+/-22 micro mol mol(-1)) exposures. Species used included two C4 grasses and two C3 forbs. Elevated CO(2) concentrations led to lower foliar Hg concentrations in plants exposed to low (i.e., ambient) air Hg degrees concentrations, but no CO(2) effect was apparent at higher air Hg degrees exposure. The observed CO(2) effect suggests that leaf Hg uptake might be controlled by leaf physiological processes such as stomatal conductance which is typically reduced under elevated CO(2). Foliar tissue exposed to elevated air Hg degrees concentrations had higher concentrations than those exposed to low air Hg degrees , but only when also exposed to elevated CO(2). The relationships for foliar Hg concentrations at different atmospheric CO(2) and Hg degrees exposures indicate that these species may have a limited capacity for Hg storage; at ambient CO(2) concentrations all Hg absorption sites in leaves may have been saturated while at elevated CO(2) when stomatal conductance was reduced saturation may have been reached only at higher concentrations of atmospheric Hg degrees . Foliar Hg concentrations were not correlated to soil Hg exposures, except for one of the four species (Rudbeckia hirta). Higher soil Hg concentrations resulted in high root Hg concentrations and considerably increased the percentage of total plant Hg allocated to roots. The large shifts in Hg allocation patterns-notably under soil conditions only slightly above natural background levels-indicate a potentially strong role of plants in belowground Hg transformation and cycling processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16631233     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  5 in total

1.  Spatial distribution and temporal trends of mercury and arsenic in remote timberline coniferous forests, eastern of the Tibet Plateau, China.

Authors:  Ronggui Tang; Haiming Wang; Ji Luo; Shouqin Sun; Yiwen Gong; Jia She; Youchao Chen; Yang Dandan; Jun Zhou
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Cadmium and mercury accumulation in European hare (Lepus europaeus): age-dependent relationships in renal and hepatic tissue.

Authors:  Zoran Petrović; Vlado Teodorović; Spomenka Djurić; Dragan Milićević; Danijela Vranić; Mirjana Lukić
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  The linear accumulation of atmospheric mercury by vegetable and grass leaves: Potential biomonitors for atmospheric mercury pollution.

Authors:  Zhenchuan Niu; Xiaoshan Zhang; Sen Wang; Zhijia Ci; Xiangrui Kong; Zhangwei Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Increased mercury in forest soils under elevated carbon dioxide.

Authors:  Susan M Natali; Sergio A Sañudo-Wilhelmy; Richard J Norby; Hong Zhang; Adrien C Finzi; Manuel T Lerdau
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Summertime elemental mercury exchange of temperate grasslands on an ecosystem-scale.

Authors:  J Fritsche; G Wohlfahrt; C Ammann; M Zeeman; A Hammerle; D Obrist; C Alewell
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 6.133

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.