Literature DB >> 16631176

Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in endometrial cancer.

L Frigerio1, A Gallo, F Ghezzi, G Trezzi, M Lussana, M Franchi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To see whether laparoscopy provides exact staging and effective treatment of endometrial cancer patients, compared with total abdominal hysterectomy, with shorter hospital stay, prompter recovery, and better quality of life.
METHOD: This retrospective study identified 110 patients scheduled for surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer. Fifty-five (50%) were treated by laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and 55 (50%) by total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). All patients underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy. The majority of patients (79%) had stage I disease.
RESULTS: The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 17 for the LAVH group and 18.5 for the TAH group (p = 0.294). Compared with TAH, LAVH required a significantly longer operating time (220 vs. 175 min; p < 0.01); but shorter hospital stay (4 vs. 8.5 days; p < 0.001) and less estimated blood loss (177 cm3 vs. 285 cm3; p = 0.02). Overall, there were fewer post-operative complications in the LAVH group (6 vs. 11 cases; p < 0.001). Three TAH patients (5.4%) had recurrence of disease. No LAVH patients had recurrences and all are currently disease-free.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest LAVH gives correct staging of endometrial disease, like TAH, but with fewer complications and a slightly longer operating time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16631176     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  6 in total

1.  Surgical staging of endometrial cancer: robotic versus open technique outcomes in a contemporary single surgeon series.

Authors:  Meenu Goel; Terrell W Zollinger; David H Moore
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-01-14

Review 2.  The incidence of postoperative symptomatic lymphocele after pelvic lymphadenectomy between abdominal and laparoscopic approach: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jong Ha Hwang; Bo Wook Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  Laparoscopy or laparotomy? A comparison of 240 patients with early-stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Alessandro Santi; Annette Kuhn; Thomas Gyr; Markus Eberhard; Silke Johann; Andreas R Günthert; Michael D Mueller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison of robotic surgery with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Longke Ran; Jing Jin; Yan Xu; Youquan Bu; Fangzhou Song
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Laparoscopic-assisted staging surgery for Korean women with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jung Hun Lee; Un Suk Jung; Min Sun Kyung; Joong Sub Choi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Realhand high dexterity instruments for the treatment of stage I uterine malignancy.

Authors:  Mark A Rettenmaier; Katrina Lopez; Cheri L Graham; John V Brown; Cameron R John; John P Micha; Bram H Goldstein
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.