BACKGROUND: Administration of C1-inhibitor concentrate is effective for prophylaxis and treatment of severe angioedema attacks caused by C1-inhibitor deficiency. The concentrate should be administered intravenously and hence needs to be administered by health care professionals, which might cause considerable delay in treatment and inconvenience for patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of on-demand and prophylactic self-administration of C1-inhibitor concentrate in patients with frequent attacks of angioedema. METHODS: Patients with hereditary or acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency who had very frequent angioedema attacks were trained to self-administer C1-inhibitor concentrate. The study consisted of 31 patients using on-demand treatment and 12 patients using prophylaxis with C1-inhibitor concentrate. Mean follow-up was 3.5 years. RESULTS: All patients were capable of self-administering the concentrate, with technical failure rates of self-injection being less than 2%. Times between the onset of the attack and the initiation of relief or complete resolution of symptoms in the on-demand group were significantly shortened (2.2 hours and 7.9 hours, respectively) compared with the situation before the start of self-administration. In the prophylaxis group self-administration of C1-inhibitor concentrate decreased the angioedema attack rate from 4.0 to 0.3 attacks per month. CONCLUSION: Intravenous self-administration of C1-inhibitor concentrate is a feasible and safe option and results in more rapid and more effective treatment or prevention of severe angioedema attacks in patients with C1-inhibitor deficiency. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Self-administration of C1-inhibitor concentrate could be a valuable and convenient treatment modality to prevent or treat angioedema attacks in patients with C1-inhibitor deficiency.
BACKGROUND: Administration of C1-inhibitor concentrate is effective for prophylaxis and treatment of severe angioedema attacks caused by C1-inhibitor deficiency. The concentrate should be administered intravenously and hence needs to be administered by health care professionals, which might cause considerable delay in treatment and inconvenience for patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of on-demand and prophylactic self-administration of C1-inhibitor concentrate in patients with frequent attacks of angioedema. METHODS:Patients with hereditary or acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency who had very frequent angioedema attacks were trained to self-administer C1-inhibitor concentrate. The study consisted of 31 patients using on-demand treatment and 12 patients using prophylaxis with C1-inhibitor concentrate. Mean follow-up was 3.5 years. RESULTS: All patients were capable of self-administering the concentrate, with technical failure rates of self-injection being less than 2%. Times between the onset of the attack and the initiation of relief or complete resolution of symptoms in the on-demand group were significantly shortened (2.2 hours and 7.9 hours, respectively) compared with the situation before the start of self-administration. In the prophylaxis group self-administration of C1-inhibitor concentrate decreased the angioedema attack rate from 4.0 to 0.3 attacks per month. CONCLUSION: Intravenous self-administration of C1-inhibitor concentrate is a feasible and safe option and results in more rapid and more effective treatment or prevention of severe angioedema attacks in patients with C1-inhibitor deficiency. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Self-administration of C1-inhibitor concentrate could be a valuable and convenient treatment modality to prevent or treat angioedema attacks in patients with C1-inhibitor deficiency.
Authors: Timothy J Craig; Richard L Wasserman; Robyn J Levy; Againdra K Bewtra; Lynda Schneider; Flint Packer; William H Yang; Heinz-Otto Keinecke; Peter C Kiessling Journal: J Clin Immunol Date: 2010-07-16 Impact factor: 8.317
Authors: Tom Bowen; Marco Cicardi; Henriette Farkas; Konrad Bork; Hilary J Longhurst; Bruce Zuraw; Emel Aygoeren-Pürsün; Timothy Craig; Karen Binkley; Jacques Hebert; Bruce Ritchie; Laurence Bouillet; Stephen Betschel; Della Cogar; John Dean; Ramachand Devaraj; Azza Hamed; Palinder Kamra; Paul K Keith; Gina Lacuesta; Eric Leith; Harriet Lyons; Sean Mace; Barbara Mako; Doris Neurath; Man-Chiu Poon; Georges-Etienne Rivard; Robert Schellenberg; Dereth Rowan; Anne Rowe; Donald Stark; Smeeksha Sur; Ellie Tsai; Richard Warrington; Susan Waserman; Rohan Ameratunga; Jonathan Bernstein; Janne Björkander; Kristylea Brosz; John Brosz; Anette Bygum; Teresa Caballero; Mike Frank; George Fust; George Harmat; Amin Kanani; Wolfhart Kreuz; Marcel Levi; Henry Li; Inmaculada Martinez-Saguer; Dumitru Moldovan; Istvan Nagy; Erik W Nielsen; Patrik Nordenfelt; Avner Reshef; Eva Rusicke; Sarah Smith-Foltz; Peter Späth; Lilian Varga; Zhi Yu Xiang Journal: Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol Date: 2010-07-28 Impact factor: 3.406