Literature DB >> 16630153

The prognosis of occupational asthma due to detergent enzymes: clinical, immunological and employment outcomes.

A Brant1, C Zekveld, J Welch, M Jones, A Newman Taylor, P Cullinan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the prognosis of occupational asthma induced by high molecular weight proteins.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to measure the clinical, immunological and employment outcomes of individuals with occupational asthma induced by detergent enzymes.
METHODS: We undertook a workforce-based follow-up study in 35 (78%) of the 45 ex-employees from a single factory with occupational asthma. In each case the diagnosis was supported by evidence of specific sensitization and characteristic changes in peak flow or a positive response to specific bronchial provocation testing.
RESULTS: This group had left the factory on average 37 months before study. On review 25 (71%) reported chest symptoms during the last month. Compared with when working at the factory, most (86%) reported that their symptoms had improved. Twenty continued to attend their general practitioner for respiratory symptoms and 19 still used asthma medications. Since leaving the factory 16 (46%) and four (11%) had found full-time or part-time employment, respectively; of these 16 found they were paid less than when they worked at the factory. The remaining 15 subjects had not had any paid employment. All but two had positive skin prick tests to one or more three detergent enzymes. The estimated half-life of serum-specific IgE antibodies was 20 months for protease, and 21 months for cellulase and amylase.
CONCLUSIONS: Population-based follow-up studies of the prognosis of occupational asthma are rare but probably avoid the bias in clinic-derived surveys. This study demonstrates that 3 years after the avoidance of exposure with detergent enzymes most patients continue to be troubled by, albeit improved, symptoms and experience difficulty in re-employment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16630153     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02465.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy        ISSN: 0954-7894            Impact factor:   5.018


  7 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of occupational asthma: an update.

Authors:  Edgardo J Jares; Carlos E Baena-Cagnani; R Maximiliano Gómez
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Asthma and rhinitis in the workplace.

Authors:  Olivier Vandenplas
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.806

3.  Defining occupational asthma and confirming the diagnosis: what do experts suggest?

Authors:  Jean-Luc Malo; Anthony Newman Taylor
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Work-related asthma in Montreal, Quebec: population attributable risk in a community-based study.

Authors:  Ahmet Demir; Lawrence Joseph; Margaret R Becklake
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.409

5.  Assessing the health impact of interventions for baker's allergy and asthma in supermarket bakeries: a group randomised trial.

Authors:  F M Al Badri; R Baatjies; Mohamed F Jeebhay
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Assessing and treating work-related asthma.

Authors:  Tracy Stoughton; Michael Prematta; Timothy Craig
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 3.406

7.  Employment status changes of workers after referral to an occupational disease clinic.

Authors:  Ayse Coskun Beyan; Yucel Demiral; Arif Cimrin
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.708

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.