Literature DB >> 16629687

Tracking stimulus processing in Pavlovian pupillary conditioning.

Günter Reinhard1, Harald Lachnit, Stephan König.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the anticipatory pupillary dilation response is a useful indicator for the examination of complex differential conditioning problems like patterning. A human fear conditioning procedure with six groups (n=20 each) was used to examine conditioned stimulus (CS) processing when a compound stimulus was reinforced, but not its elements (positive patterning) or when the elements were reinforced, but not the compound (negative patterning), as well as modifications in which the compound was replaced by either a new compound or by a new element. We found evidence for conditioning within 2 s after CS onset. Group differences in differential conditioning indicated systematic differences in CS processing due to different discrimination task difficulties. This study showed that the pupil response is a suitable indicator for human Pavlovian conditioning with high time resolution within and between trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16629687     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00374.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  14 in total

1.  The use of pupillometry in the assessment of cardiac autonomic function in elite different type trained athletes.

Authors:  Antonia Kaltsatou; Evangelia Kouidi; Dimitrios Fotiou; Pantazis Deligiannis
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Brain, body, and cognition: neural, physiological and self-report correlates of phobic and normative fear.

Authors:  Hillary S Schaefer; Christine L Larson; Richard J Davidson; James A Coan
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.251

3.  Neural pattern similarity predicts long-term fear memory.

Authors:  Renée M Visser; H Steven Scholte; Tinka Beemsterboer; Merel Kindt
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Lyin' eyes: ocular-motor measures of reading reveal deception.

Authors:  Anne E Cook; Douglas J Hacker; Andrea K Webb; Dahvyn Osher; Sean D Kristjansson; Dan J Woltz; John C Kircher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2012-04-30

Review 5.  Translational approaches to anxiety: focus on genetics, fear extinction and brain imaging.

Authors:  Angelika Erhardt; Victor I Spoormaker
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  How to detect amygdala activity with magnetoencephalography using source imaging.

Authors:  Nicholas L Balderston; Douglas H Schultz; Sylvain Baillet; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Attentional Bias for Uncertain Cues of Shock in Human Fear Conditioning: Evidence for Attentional Learning Theory.

Authors:  Stephan Koenig; Metin Uengoer; Harald Lachnit
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Modeling startle eyeblink electromyogram to assess fear learning.

Authors:  Saurabh Khemka; Athina Tzovara; Samuel Gerster; Boris B Quednow; Dominik R Bach
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Eye Movements Index Implicit Memory Expression in Fear Conditioning.

Authors:  Lauren S Hopkins; Douglas H Schultz; Deborah E Hannula; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A pupil size response model to assess fear learning.

Authors:  Christoph W Korn; Matthias Staib; Athina Tzovara; Giuseppe Castegnetti; Dominik R Bach
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.