Literature DB >> 16629564

The impact of gender and marital status on end-of-life care: evidence from the National Mortality Follow-Back Survey.

Melissa W Wachterman1, Benjamin D Sommers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: End-of-life care poses a growing clinical and policy concern. Gender and marital status may play important roles in shaping end-of-life care.
OBJECTIVE: To examine gender and marital status differences across multiple end-of-life care outcomes: primary residence in the last year of life (LYL), place of death, hospice use, type of formal and informal caregivers, and primary payment source for end-of-life care.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression. PARTICIPANTS: A nationally representative sample of 12,771 individuals who died of natural causes, from the 1993 National Mortality Followback Survey.
RESULTS: After multivariate adjustment, the only gender differences in end-of-life care were that women were more likely to receive formal or informal care in the LYL and more likely to be on Medicaid. After adjustment, unmarried individuals (widowed, divorced/separated, and single) were more likely than married people to live their LYL and die in nursing homes, less likely to receive formal or informal care in the LYL, and more likely to be on Medicaid. Hospice use was low, with minimal gender and marital status differences.
CONCLUSIONS: Marital status is a key variable mediating gender differences in end-of-life care. Unmarried individuals are less likely to receive help from informal caregivers-most notably because of the lack of spousal care-which may explain why they are more likely to end up in nursing homes. Clinicians need to be aware of the impact of marital status on endof- life care. Policymakers should consider that women will be disproportionately affected by policy changes in public financing for end-of-life care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16629564     DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  13 in total

1.  Patterns of hospice care among military veterans and non-veterans.

Authors:  Melissa W Wachterman; Stuart R Lipsitz; Steven R Simon; Karl A Lorenz; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Associations between Race and Dementia Status and the Quality of End-of-Life Care.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Luth; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Care utilisation in the last years of life in Sweden: the effects of gender and marital status differ by type of care.

Authors:  Kristina Larsson; Ingemar Kåreholt; Mats Thorslund
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2014-09-10

4.  Prescribing practices in hospice patients with adult failure to thrive or debility.

Authors:  Leah Sera; Holly M Holmes; Mary Lynn McPherson
Journal:  Prog Palliat Care       Date:  2014-04-01

5.  Does Caregiving Strain Increase as Patients With and Without Dementia Approach the End of Life?

Authors:  Judith B Vick; Katherine A Ornstein; Sarah L Szanton; Sydney M Dy; Jennifer L Wolff
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Dying of cancer in Italy: impact on family and caregiver. The Italian Survey of Dying of Cancer.

Authors:  Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Monica Beccaro; Guido Miccinesi; Piero Borgia; Massimo Costantini; Francesco Chini; Diego Baiocchi; Giovanna De Giacomi; Maria Grimaldi; Maurizio Montella
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Marital status and mortality among middle age and elderly men and women in urban Shanghai.

Authors:  Puthiery Va; Wan-Shui Yang; Sarah Nechuta; Wong-Ho Chow; Hui Cai; Gong Yang; Shan Gao; Yu-Tang Gao; Wei Zheng; Xiao-Ou Shu; Yong-Bing Xiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Revisiting the Role of Gender and Marital Status as Risk Factors for Nursing Home Entry.

Authors:  Maria Casanova
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.942

9.  Death at no cost? Persons with no health insurance claims in the last year of life in Switzerland.

Authors:  Radoslaw Panczak; Viktor von Wyl; Oliver Reich; Xhyljeta Luta; Maud Maessen; Andreas E Stuck; Claudia Berlin; Kurt Schmidlin; David C Goodman; Matthias Egger; Kerri Clough-Gorr; Marcel Zwahlen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 10.  Going it Alone: A Scoping Review of Unbefriended Older Adults.

Authors:  Stephanie Chamberlain; Sol Baik; Carole Estabrooks
Journal:  Can J Aging       Date:  2018-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.