Literature DB >> 16629016

Quantification of Campylobacter on the surface and in the muscle of chicken legs at retail.

Kathrin Scherer1, Edda Bartelt, Christine Sommerfeld, Goetz Hildebrandt.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and numbers of Campylobacter on the skin and in the muscle of chicken legs at retail to examine the external and internal contamination for an exposure assessment. Furthermore, the study assessed seasonal influence on Campylobacter contamination in chicken legs. Of the 140 examined skin samples, 66% were positive, and the internal contamination of 115 sampled chicken legs was 27%. The enumeration of Campylobacter on the surface of positive chicken legs revealed a median of 2.4 log CFU/g of skin, and the quantification of Campylobacter in the muscle gave results mainly under the detection limit of the most-probable-number method (<0.3 MPN Campylobacter per g). The external contamination was significantly higher than the internal. In both skin and muscle samples, Campylobacter jejuni had a much higher incidence than Campylobacter coli. However, with regard to the specification of Campylobacter on the surface of chicken legs, C. coli was isolated at higher colony counts than C. jejuni. During the 1-year study, two peaks of Campylobacter contamination occurred, one in the early springtime (February and March, 100 and 90%, respectively) and the second during the warmer months in the summer (July and August, both 90%). Furthermore, a positive correlation between prevalence and numbers of Campylobacter on chicken legs was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16629016     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  7 in total

1.  Quantification of campylobacter species cross-contamination during handling of contaminated fresh chicken parts in kitchens.

Authors:  Petra Luber; Sigrid Brynestad; Daniela Topsch; Kathrin Scherer; Edda Bartelt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Quo vadis? - Monitoring Campylobacter in Germany.

Authors:  K Stingl; M-T Knüver; P Vogt; C Buhler; N-J Krüger; K Alt; B-A Tenhagen; M Hartung; A Schroeter; L Ellerbroek; B Appel; A Käsbohrer
Journal:  Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp)       Date:  2012-03-17

Review 3.  The Data Behind Risk Analysis of Campylobacter Jejuni and Campylobacter Coli Infections.

Authors:  Racem Ben Romdhane; Roswitha Merle
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

4.  Acute Gastroenteritis and Campylobacteriosis in Swiss Primary Care: The Viewpoint of General Practitioners.

Authors:  Philipp J Bless; Joan Muela Ribera; Claudia Schmutz; Andreas Zeller; Daniel Mäusezahl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Two-Round Treatment With Propidium Monoazide Completely Inhibits the Detection of Dead Campylobacter spp. Cells by Quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Ayaka Okada; Mizuki Tsuchida; Md Matiur Rahman; Yasuo Inoshima
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Epidemiology of campylobacteriosis in Germany - insights from 10 years of surveillance.

Authors:  Anika Schielke; Bettina M Rosner; Klaus Stark
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.090

7.  Heterogeneity in the Infection Biology of Campylobacter jejuni Isolates in Three Infection Models Reveals an Invasive and Virulent Phenotype in a ST21 Isolate from Poultry.

Authors:  Suzanne Humphrey; Lizeth Lacharme-Lora; Gemma Chaloner; Kirsty Gibbs; Tom Humphrey; Nicola Williams; Paul Wigley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.