Literature DB >> 16628708

In vitro and in vivo (cyto)toxicity assays using PVC and LDPE as model materials.

E A E Van Tienhoven1, D Korbee, L Schipper, H W Verharen, W H De Jong.   

Abstract

The choice for a biomaterial is partly based on the outcome of (cyto)toxicity assays. The rationales behind the selection of certain parameters, such as cell lines, controls, and animals, were evaluated using a positive and a negative control, and one experimental sample designed to induce intermediate toxicity. Extraction and direct contact assays were performed using human epidermal keratinocytes and mouse fibroblasts and mouse epithelial cells. Cell survival was measured with the tetrazolium salt (MTT) reduction assay. In addition, local implantation studies were performed in mice and rats. The positive control induced a high degree of toxicity in all in vitro tests performed, indicating that the toxicity observed in the direct contact assay was due to in situ extraction of toxic components. In the direct contact assay the negative control tested on the mouse fibroblasts resulted in a significant reduction of cell survival. No decrease in cell survival was found using the experimental sample. Subcutaneous implantation studies in mice showed that the positive control material induced a severe degeneration in mice. However, in rats just minimal alterations were noted. The experimental material induced moderate responses only in mice. Our results indicate that the direct contact assay provides limited additional information on the cytotoxicity of materials if certain limitations are not taken into account. For the in vivo implantation assay mice were superior to rats in detecting local toxic responses. Copyright (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16628708     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  7 in total

1.  Infiltration and sustenance of viability of cells by amphiphilic biosynthetic biodegradable hydrogels.

Authors:  Finosh Gnanaprakasam Thankam; Jayabalan Muthu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Biocompatibility of nanoporous alumina membranes for immunoisolation.

Authors:  Kristen E La Flamme; Ketul C Popat; Lara Leoni; Erica Markiewicz; Thomas J La Tempa; Brian B Roman; Craig A Grimes; Tejal A Desai
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  The Development of Indicator Cotton Swabs for the Detection of pH in Wounds.

Authors:  Cindy Schaude; Eleonore Fröhlich; Claudia Meindl; Jennifer Attard; Barbara Binder; Gerhard J Mohr
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  Graphene-Based Nanomaterials for Tissue Engineering in the Dental Field.

Authors:  Riccardo Guazzo; Chiara Gardin; Gloria Bellin; Luca Sbricoli; Letizia Ferroni; Francesco Saverio Ludovichetti; Adriano Piattelli; Iulian Antoniac; Eriberto Bressan; Barbara Zavan
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-20       Impact factor: 5.076

5.  Characterization and Biological Evaluation of Propolis from Poland.

Authors:  Milena Popova; Efstathia Giannopoulou; Krystyna Skalicka-Woźniak; Konstantia Graikou; Jaroslaw Widelski; Vassya Bankova; Haralabos Kalofonos; Gregory Sivolapenko; Katarzyna Gaweł-Bęben; Beata Antosiewicz; Ioanna Chinou
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  In vitro assessment of the biocompatibility of chemically treated silicone materials with human lens epithelial cells.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Y Kao; Junghee Seo; David J McCanna; Lakshman N Subbaraman; Lyndon W Jones
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Polystyrene and Polyethylene Microplastics Decrease Cell Viability and Dysregulate Inflammatory and Oxidative Stress Markers of MDCK and L929 Cells In Vitro.

Authors:  Swetha Palaniappan; Chakravarthy Marx Sadacharan; Bahman Rostama
Journal:  Expo Health       Date:  2021-07-25       Impact factor: 8.835

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.