Literature DB >> 16628063

The effects of volatile anesthetics on intraoperative monitoring of myogenic motor-evoked potentials to transcranial electrical stimulation and on partial neuromuscular blockade during propofol/fentanyl/nitrous oxide anesthesia in humans.

Kenichi Sekimoto1, Koichi Nishikawa, Junko Ishizeki, Kazuhiro Kubo, Shigeru Saito, Fumio Goto.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the influence of volatile anesthetics on transcranial motor-evoked potentials (tcMEP) in humans anesthetized with propofol/fentanyl/nitrous oxide and on partial neuromuscular blockade (NMB). The authors studied 35 ASA I and II patients who were undergoing elective craniotomy and brain tumor resection. The patients were randomized to one of three groups to receive halothane (HAL), isoflurane (ISO), or sevoflurane (SEV). Anesthetic depth was initially adjusted using the bispectral index to 40+/-5, and NMB was adjusted to 40%-50% of one twitch of train of four (T1) after recovery from intubation. MEPs with train of five square-wave pulses were elicited using screw electrodes placed in the skull over C3-C4. After craniotomy, the inhalational agent was introduced at 0.5 MAC and then 1.0 MAC (20 minutes each), and the effects on MEPs, NMB, and hemodynamic variables were studied. A decrease in BIS and systolic blood pressure was observed with all agents. Both SEV and ISO at 1.0 MAC significantly decreased train-of-four ratio from 38.4+/-18.1 at control to 19.0+/-9.7 and from 35.3+/-12.4 to 26.1+/-13.7, respectively (P<0.001), but not HAL at 1.0 MAC. The amplitudes of tcMEPs were significantly reduced by all agents at 1.0 MAC, with the effect being less in HAL at 0.5 MAC. We have shown that HAL had a lesser suppressive effect on MEPs than either ISO or SEV at 0.5 MAC, which was partially due to a lesser degree of NMB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16628063     DOI: 10.1097/00008506-200604000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol        ISSN: 0898-4921            Impact factor:   3.956


  7 in total

Review 1.  Muscle relaxant use during intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring.

Authors:  Tod B Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Differential effect of halothane on motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial electric or magnetic stimulation in the monkey.

Authors:  Tod Sloan; J Rogers
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Lateral spread response monitoring during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. Comparison of two targets of partial neuromuscular blockade.

Authors:  Y H Chung; W H Kim; J J Lee; S-I Yang; S H Lim; D W Seo; K Park; I S Chung
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  Current approach on spinal cord monitoring: the point of view of the neurologist, the anesthesiologist and the spine surgeon.

Authors:  Thomas N Pajewski; Vincent Arlet; Lawrence H Phillips
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Dexmedetomidine as a sedative and analgesic adjuvant in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Georgia G Tsaousi; Chryssa Pourzitaki; Simone Aloisio; Federico Bilotta
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil in postoperative pain control after spinal surgery: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Wonjung Hwang; Jaemin Lee; Jihyun Park; Jin Joo
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 7.  Anesthetic influence on occurrence and treatment of the trigemino-cardiac reflex: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Cyrill Meuwly; Tumul Chowdhury; Nora Sandu; Martin Reck; Paul Erne; Bernhard Schaller
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.889

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.