Literature DB >> 16627743

Stability via asynchrony in Drosophila metapopulations with low migration rates.

Sutirth Dey1, Amitabh Joshi.   

Abstract

Very few experimental studies have examined how migration rate affects metapopulation dynamics and stability. We studied the dynamics of replicate laboratory metapopulations of Drosophila under different migration rates. Low migration stabilized metapopulation dynamics, while promoting unstable subpopulation dynamics, by inducing asynchrony among neighboring subpopulations. High migration synchronized subpopulation dynamics, thereby destabilizing the metapopulations. Contrary to some theoretical predictions, increased migration did not affect average population size. Simulations based on a simple non-species-specific population growth model captured most features of the data, which suggests that our results are generalizable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16627743     DOI: 10.1126/science.1125317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  32 in total

1.  Use of multiple dispersal pathways facilitates amphibian persistence in stream networks.

Authors:  Evan H Campbell Grant; James D Nichols; Winsor H Lowe; William F Fagan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Testing the interaction between environmental variation and dispersal strategy on population dynamics using a soil mite experimental system.

Authors:  Diana E Bowler; Tim G Benton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Simple laboratory tests of ecological theories: what we can learn from them, and when we should be cautious.

Authors:  Mike S Fowler; Lasse Ruokolainen
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Population synchrony in small-world networks.

Authors:  Esa Ranta; Mike S Fowler; Veijo Kaitala
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Synchronization-induced persistence versus selection for habitats in spatially coupled ecosystems.

Authors:  Adam Lampert; Alan Hastings
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Stochastic environmental fluctuations drive epidemiology in experimental host-parasite metapopulations.

Authors:  Alison B Duncan; Andrew Gonzalez; Oliver Kaltz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Environment, but not migration rate, influences extinction risk in experimental metapopulations.

Authors:  Blaine D Griffen; John M Drake
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Predators reduce extinction risk in noisy metapopulations.

Authors:  James C Bull; Michael B Bonsall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Optimizing metapopulation sustainability through a checkerboard strategy.

Authors:  Yossi Ben Zion; Gur Yaari; Nadav M Shnerb
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Extinctions in heterogeneous environments and the evolution of modularity.

Authors:  Nadav Kashtan; Merav Parter; Erez Dekel; Avi E Mayo; Uri Alon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.