Literature DB >> 16627356

Decomposing retrieval and integration in memory for actions: a multinomial modeling approach.

Melanie C Steffens1, Petra Jelenec, Silvia Mecklenbräuker, Erin Marie Thompson.   

Abstract

Typically, action phrases are recalled better if participants are asked to enact the phrases than if they are just asked to remember them. When investigating which processes constitute this enactment effect a difficulty is that observable effects in standard memory tests are ambiguous because such tests require several processes. In the present article, we introduce a multinomial model that decomposes observable memory performance into a retrieval parameter and a parameter concerning the item-specific processing and integration of an action phrase. These parameters are estimated from free recall and cued recall performance. The model fitted the data of two experiments designed to test it. Experiment 1 demonstrated the basic usefulness of the model by showing expected differences in the integration parameter in the absence of unexpected differences in the retrieval parameter. Experiment 2 extended the conditions under which the model is useful by showing expected differences in the retrieval parameter even in the presence of unexpected differences in the integration parameter. Together, these findings support our theoretical framework according to which enactment generally boosts integration of action phrases, but increases retrieval only for phrases with context cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16627356     DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  9 in total

1.  Limits on the role of retrieval cues in memory for actions: enactment effects in the absence of object cues in the environment.

Authors:  Melanie C Steffens; Axel Buchner; Karl F Wender; Claudia Decker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

2.  Memory for goal-directed sequences of actions: is doing better than seeing?

Authors:  Meianie C Steffens
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

3.  Gesturing makes memories that last.

Authors:  Susan Wagner Cook; Terina Kuangyi Yip; Susan Goldin-Meadow
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Enactment versus observation: item-specific and relational processing in goal-directed action sequences (and lists of single actions).

Authors:  Janette Schult; Rul von Stülpnagel; Melanie C Steffens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Do actions speak louder than words? Examining children's ability to follow instructions.

Authors:  Amanda H Waterman; Amy L Atkinson; Sadia S Aslam; Joni Holmes; Agnieszka Jaroslawska; Richard J Allen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-08

6.  The Role of Item-Specific Information for the Retrieval Awareness of Performed Actions.

Authors:  Guangzheng Li; Lijuan Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-14

7.  Memory Recall After "Learning by Doing" and "Learning by Viewing": Boundary Conditions of an Enactment Benefit.

Authors:  Melanie C Steffens; Rul von Stülpnagel; Janette C Schult
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-17

8.  The Direct Testing Effect Is Pervasive in Action Memory: Analyses of Recall Accuracy and Recall Speed.

Authors:  Veit Kubik; Fredrik U Jönsson; Monika Knopf; Wolfgang Mack
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-13

9.  The Effects of Language and Semantic Repetition on the Enactment Effect of Action Memory.

Authors:  Xinyuan Zhang; Sascha Zuber
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.