Literature DB >> 16627354

Programming strategies for rapid aiming movements under simple and choice reaction time conditions.

Michael A Khan1, Gavin P Lawrence, Eric Buckolz, Ian M Franks.   

Abstract

Increases in reaction time (RT) as a function of response complexity have been shown to differ between simple and choice RT tasks. Of interest in the present study was whether the influence of response complexity on RT depends on the extent to which movements are programmed in advance of movement initiation versus during execution (i.e., online). The task consisted of manual aiming movements to one or two targets (one- vs. two-element responses) under simple and choice RT conditions. The probe RT technique was employed to assess attention demands during RT and movement execution. Simple RT was greater for the two- than for the single-target responses but choice RT was not influenced by the number of elements. In both RT tasks, reaction times to the probe increased as a function of number of elements when the probe occurred during movement execution. The presence of the probe also caused an increase in aiming errors in the simple but not choice RT task. These findings indicated that online programming was occurring in both RT tasks. In the simple RT task, increased executive control mediated the integration between response elements through the utilization of visual feedback to facilitate the implementation of the second element.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16627354     DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  11 in total

1.  The effect of distance on reaction time in aiming movements.

Authors:  Heather Munro; Mandy S Plumb; Andrew D Wilson; Justin H G Williams; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The preparation and control of reversal movements as a single unit of action.

Authors:  Michael A Khan; Luc Tremblay; Darian T Cheng; Marlene Luis; Stuart J Mourton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Response preparation changes during practice of an asynchronous bimanual movement.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Global inhibition and midcourse corrections in speeded aiming.

Authors:  Erica L Wohldmann; Alice F Healy; Lyle E Bourne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-10

5.  The violation of Fitts' Law: an examination of displacement biases and corrective submovements.

Authors:  James W Roberts; Jarrod Blinch; Digby Elliott; Romeo Chua; James L Lyons; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Experimental validation of the diffusion model based on a slow response time paradigm.

Authors:  Veronika Lerche; Andreas Voss
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-12-09

7.  Exploring specificity of speeded aiming movements: Examining different measures of transfer.

Authors:  Erica L Wohldmann; Alice F Healy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-04

8.  Stimulation of subthalamic nuclei restores a near normal planning strategy in Parkinson's patients.

Authors:  Giovanni Mirabella; Sara Iaconelli; Nicola Modugno; Giorgio Giannini; Francesco Lena; Gianpaolo Cantore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Influence of cueing on the preparation and execution of untrained and trained complex motor responses.

Authors:  S R Alouche; G N Sant'Anna; G Biagioni; L E Ribeiro-do-Valle
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.590

10.  Differential beta-band event-related desynchronization during categorical action sequence planning.

Authors:  Hame Park; June Sic Kim; Chun Kee Chung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.