PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of erlotinib plus radiation therapy (RT) in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in a multicenter phase I trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were stratified on the basis of the use of enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants (EIACs). After resection or biopsy, patients were treated with erlotinib for 1 week before concurrent erlotinib and 6 weeks (60 Gy) of RT and maintained on erlotinib until progression. The erlotinib dose was escalated in cohorts of 3 starting at 100 mg/day. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled and 19 were evaluable for the MTD and efficacy endpoints. Of these patients, 14 were males and 5 were females, with a median age of 54 years. Seven had undergone biopsy only, 5 had subtotal resections, and 7 had gross total resections. The highest dose level was 150 mg/day erlotinib for patients not on EIACs (Group 1) and 200 mg/day for patients on EIACs (Group 2). MTD was not reached in either group. In Group 1 at 100 mg (n=6) and at 150 mg (n=4), only 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred (stomatitis at 100 mg). No DLTs have occurred in Group 2 at 100 mg (n=3), 150 mg (n=3), and 200 mg (n=3). With a median follow-up of 52 weeks, progression was documented in 16 patients and 13 deaths occurred. Median time to progression was 26 weeks, and median survival was 55 weeks. CONCLUSION: Toxicity is acceptable at the current doses of erlotinib plus RT. The study was modified to include concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide, and accrual is in progress.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of erlotinib plus radiation therapy (RT) in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in a multicenter phase I trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were stratified on the basis of the use of enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants (EIACs). After resection or biopsy, patients were treated with erlotinib for 1 week before concurrent erlotinib and 6 weeks (60 Gy) of RT and maintained on erlotinib until progression. The erlotinib dose was escalated in cohorts of 3 starting at 100 mg/day. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled and 19 were evaluable for the MTD and efficacy endpoints. Of these patients, 14 were males and 5 were females, with a median age of 54 years. Seven had undergone biopsy only, 5 had subtotal resections, and 7 had gross total resections. The highest dose level was 150 mg/day erlotinib for patients not on EIACs (Group 1) and 200 mg/day for patients on EIACs (Group 2). MTD was not reached in either group. In Group 1 at 100 mg (n=6) and at 150 mg (n=4), only 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred (stomatitis at 100 mg). No DLTs have occurred in Group 2 at 100 mg (n=3), 150 mg (n=3), and 200 mg (n=3). With a median follow-up of 52 weeks, progression was documented in 16 patients and 13 deaths occurred. Median time to progression was 26 weeks, and median survival was 55 weeks. CONCLUSION:Toxicity is acceptable at the current doses of erlotinib plus RT. The study was modified to include concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide, and accrual is in progress.
Authors: Jann N Sarkaria; Eva Galanis; Wenting Wu; Allan B Dietz; Timothy J Kaufmann; Michael P Gustafson; Paul D Brown; Joon H Uhm; Ravi D Rao; Laurence Doyle; Caterina Giannini; Kurt A Jaeckle; Jan C Buckner Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-10-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: David A Reardon; Annick Desjardins; James J Vredenburgh; Sridharan Gururangan; Allan H Friedman; James E Herndon; Jennifer Marcello; Julie A Norfleet; Roger E McLendon; John H Sampson; Henry S Friedman Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2009-06-28 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Michael D Prados; Susan M Chang; Nicholas Butowski; Rebecca DeBoer; Rupa Parvataneni; Hannah Carliner; Paul Kabuubi; Jennifer Ayers-Ringler; Jane Rabbitt; Margaretta Page; Anne Fedoroff; Penny K Sneed; Mitchel S Berger; Michael W McDermott; Andrew T Parsa; Scott Vandenberg; C David James; Kathleen R Lamborn; David Stokoe; Daphne A Haas-Kogan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Paul D Brown; Sunil Krishnan; Jann N Sarkaria; Wenting Wu; Kurt A Jaeckle; Joon H Uhm; Francois J Geoffroy; Robert Arusell; Gaspar Kitange; Robert B Jenkins; John W Kugler; Roscoe F Morton; Kendrith M Rowland; Paul Mischel; William H Yong; Bernd W Scheithauer; David Schiff; Caterina Giannini; Jan C Buckner Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-10-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Preusser; E Gelpi; A Rottenfusser; K Dieckmann; G Widhalm; W Dietrich; A Bertalanffy; D Prayer; J A Hainfellner; Christine Marosi Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2008-05-06 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: David M Peereboom; Dale R Shepard; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Cathy J Brewer; Neeraj Agarwal; Glen H J Stevens; John H Suh; Steven A Toms; Michael A Vogelbaum; Robert J Weil; Paul Elson; Gene H Barnett Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2009-12-04 Impact factor: 4.130