Literature DB >> 16626827

Staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma investigated by magnetic resonance imaging.

Jin-Cheng Lu1, Bao-Qing Wei, Wen-Zhan Chen, Pu-Dong Qian, Yi-Qin Zhang, Qing Wei, Wen-Wu Cha, Feng Li, Ming Ni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To investigate the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) sixth edition staging system of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-nine non-disseminated biopsy-proven NPC patients were studied with MRI before treatment. Retrieval of MRI information enabled us to restage all patients accurately according to the sixth edition of the AJCC staging system. Splitting the respective T and N stages by the significant defining factors identified, the cancer death hazard ratios were modeled by the Cox model in SPSS 10.0 for windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL).
RESULTS: Single site of skull base abnormality (HR = 3.91, 95% CI: 0.74-20.56) has a superior result to others involved in T3 (HR = 5.83, 95% CI: 1.24-27.29). Involvement of either anterior or posterior cranial nerves solely (HR = 6.02, 95% CI: 1.55-35.60) was not found to be as a poor prognostic indicator as others involved in T4 (HR = 7.81, 95% CI: 1.81-33.63). Less than or equal to 3 cm of N1 (HR = 4.01, 95% CI: 0.48-33.83) and N2 (HR = 4.72, 95% CI: 0.62-35.78) have a better result than >3 cm of N1 (HR = 8.09, 95% CI: 0.95-68.97) and N2 (HR = 10.58, 95% CI: 1.32-84.62), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Perhaps, it is better to down-stage single site of skull base abnormality from T3 to T2, and involvement of either anterior or posterior cranial nerves solely from T4 to T3, meanwhile, < or =3 cm of N2 down-stage to N1, >3 cm of N1 up-stage to N2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16626827     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  5 in total

1.  MRI-detected skull-base invasion: prognostic value and therapeutic implication in intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yi-Kan Cheng; Li-Zhi Liu; Ning Jiang; Dan Yue; Ling-Long Tang; Fan Zhang; Li Lin; Xu Liu; Lei Chen; Jun Ma
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  Patterns of regional lymph node metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis of clinical evidence.

Authors:  Francis C H Ho; Ivan W K Tham; Arul Earnest; Khai Mun Lee; Jiade J Lu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Prognostic factors and failure patterns in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yan-Ping Mao; Ling-Long Tang; Lei Chen; Ying Sun; Zhen-Yu Qi; Guan-Qun Zhou; Li-Zhi Liu; Li Li; Ai-Hua Lin; Jun Ma
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2016-12-28

4.  Application of Artificial Intelligence in Radiotherapy of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Wanlu Zhao; Desheng Zhang; Xinjian Mao
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.682

5.  Comparison of TNM staging systems for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and proposal of a new staging system.

Authors:  P-Y OuYang; Z Su; X-H Ma; Y-P Mao; M-Z Liu; F-Y Xie
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.