Literature DB >> 1662638

Double-blind, double-dummy comparison of azithromycin and cephalexin in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections.

R Kiani1.   

Abstract

In this double-blind, randomised trial conducted in 22 centres in the USA, azithromycin given over five days, as a once-a-day regimen, (500 mg on day 1, 250 mg on days 2-5) was compared with cephalexin (500 mg b.i.d.) given for ten days in the treatment of patients with skin and skin structure infections. A total of 366 patients entered the study and 179 of these were eligible for the efficacy analysis. The overall clinical response to azithromycin was 94.0%, compared with 95.8% for cephalexin. The clinical cure rates were 53.0% for azithromycin and 59.4% for cephalexin; the respective improvement rates were 41.0% and 36.5%. Distribution of response (cured, improved, failed) was similar in each group (p = 0.37). The bacteriological eradication rate for azithromycin-treated patients was 94.2% and for cephalexin-treated patients was 90.3% (p = 0.34). Clinical and bacteriological response was similar in each group for all primary diagnoses. The two antibiotics were well tolerated, the overall incidence of side effects being 13.7% with approximately 60% due to gastrointestinal disturbances. In all but one case (cephalexin) the severity of the reported side effects was mild or moderate. Six patients withdrew from the study due to treatment-related events; five had been treated with azithromycin and one with cephalexin. In summary, a five-day, once-daily regimen of azithromycin was as effective as a ten-day, twice-daily regimen of cephalexin in the treatment of patients with skin and skin structure infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1662638     DOI: 10.1007/bf01975848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  5 in total

1.  Spectrum and mode of action of azithromycin (CP-62,993), a new 15-membered-ring macrolide with improved potency against gram-negative organisms.

Authors:  J Retsema; A Girard; W Schelkly; M Manousos; M Anderson; G Bright; R Borovoy; L Brennan; R Mason
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Plasmid-mediated factors associated with virulence of bacteria to animals.

Authors:  L P Elwell; P L Shipley
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 15.500

3.  The pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in human serum and tissues.

Authors:  G Foulds; R M Shepard; R B Johnson
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo activity of novel 9-deoxo-9a-AZA-9a-homoerythromycin A derivatives; a new class of macrolide antibiotics, the azalides.

Authors:  G M Bright; A A Nagel; J Bordner; K A Desai; J N Dibrino; J Nowakowska; L Vincent; R M Watrous; F C Sciavolino; A R English
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Pharmacokinetic and in vivo studies with azithromycin (CP-62,993), a new macrolide with an extended half-life and excellent tissue distribution.

Authors:  A E Girard; D Girard; A R English; T D Gootz; C R Cimochowski; J A Faiella; S L Haskell; J A Retsema
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.191

  5 in total
  10 in total

1.  Treatment failure definitions for non-purulent skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review.

Authors:  Krishan Yadav; Avik Nath; Kathryn N Suh; Lindsey Sikora; Debra Eagles
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing a penicillin or cephalosporin with a macrolide or lincosamide in the treatment of cellulitis or erysipelas.

Authors:  Athena Ferreira; Mark J Bolland; Mark G Thomas
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Flucloxacillin alone or combined with benzylpenicillin to treat lower limb cellulitis: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  P Leman; D Mukherjee
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Interventions for impetigo.

Authors:  Sander Koning; Renske van der Sande; Arianne P Verhagen; Lisette W A van Suijlekom-Smit; Andrew D Morris; Christopher C Butler; Marjolein Berger; Johannes C van der Wouden
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-01-18

Review 5.  Ketolides--the modern relatives of macrolides : the pharmacokinetic perspective.

Authors:  Markus Zeitlinger; Claudia Christina Wagner; Birgit Heinisch
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Macrolides: A Canadian Infectious Disease Society position paper.

Authors:  S McKenna; G Evans
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2001-07

Review 7.  Cellulitis and erysipelas.

Authors:  Andrew D Morris
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-01-02

Review 8.  Azithromycin. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy.

Authors:  D H Peters; H A Friedel; D McTavish
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Is coverage of S. aureus necessary in cellulitis/erysipelas? A literature review.

Authors:  Stamatis Karakonstantis
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 10.  Interventions for cellulitis and erysipelas.

Authors:  Sally A Kilburn; Peter Featherstone; Bernie Higgins; Richard Brindle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-06-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.