Literature DB >> 16626351

Prospective randomised controlled trial on the role of patient information leaflets in obtaining informed consent.

Seemab Ashraff1, Gideon Malawa, Trevor Dolan, Vikas Khanduja.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether patient information leaflets help to improve patient recall during the process of informed consent.
METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared a group of patients who were posted a patient information leaflet with those given verbal consent only was carried out. The study was conducted at the orthopaedic unit of a district general hospital. A total of 110 patients were selected, of whom 57 were randomly allocated to receive patient information leaflets by post and 53 were given verbal consent only. The outcome measure was the recall of information given to the patient. This was tested on admission by using a questionnaire. Each patient was allocated a score out of 10.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the patients in the group that received patient information leaflets and those in the group that did not (P < 0.0001; confidence interval, 2.0-3.1).
CONCLUSION: Patient information leaflets are a useful tool for the surgeon to improve the recall of the information given to the patient, in order to facilitate informed consent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16626351     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03671.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  9 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yael Schenker; Alicia Fernandez; Rebecca Sudore; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Patient perception of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of inguinal hernia, the hard sell.

Authors:  M Patel; G Garcea; K Fairhurst; A R Dennison
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions.

Authors:  Wouter K G Leclercq; Bram J Keulers; Marc R M Scheltinga; Paul H M Spauwen; Gert-Jan van der Wilt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  An audit of consenting practices in a district general hospital. Can we improve?

Authors:  E Chohda; S Doddi; S Sundaramoorthy; R N Manton; A Ahad; A Sinha; H Khawaja
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

5.  Effect of Consent and Educational Adjuncts to Consent on Patient Perceptions About Colonoscopy.

Authors:  David I Fudman; Konstantinos Papamichael; Lilach Roemi; Varun Rao; Kenneth R Falchuk; Daniel A Leffler; Joseph D Feuerstein
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.062

6.  The consent process: Enabling or disabling patients' active participation?

Authors:  Carole Doherty; Charitini Stavropoulou; Mark Nk Saunders; Tracey Brown
Journal:  Health (London)       Date:  2016-07-26

7.  How to effectively obtain informed consent in trauma patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yen-Ko Lin; Kuan-Ting Liu; Chao-Wen Chen; Wei-Che Lee; Chia-Ju Lin; Leiyu Shi; Yin-Chun Tien
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  The influence of process and patient factors on the recall of consent information in mentally competent patients undergoing surgery for neck of femur fractures.

Authors:  S K Khan; K Karuppaiah; A S Bajwa
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 9.  How best to use and evaluate Patient Information Leaflets given during a consultation: a systematic review of literature reviews.

Authors:  Mélanie Sustersic; Aurélie Gauchet; Alison Foote; Jean-Luc Bosson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.377

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.