Literature DB >> 16626349

Predicting iatrogenic gall bladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors.

Kamran Mohiuddin1, Saira Nizami, Robert J Fitzgibbons, Patricia Watson, Breda Memon, Muhammed A Memon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Seventeen independent risk factors were examined using multivariate logistic regression analysis to develop a profile of patients most likely at risk from iatrogenic gall bladder perforation (IGBP) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS: Since 1989, a prospectively maintained database on 856 (women, 659; men, 197) consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies by a single surgeon (R. J. F.) was analysed. The mean age was 48 years (range, 17-94 years). The mean operating time was 88 min (range, 25-375 min) and the mean postoperative stay was 1 day (range, 1-24 days). There were 311 (women, 214; men, 97) IGBP. Seventeen independent variables, which included sex, race, history of biliary colic, dyspepsia, history of acute cholecystitis, acute pancreatitis and jaundice, previous abdominal surgery, previous upper abdominal surgery, medical illness, use of intraoperative laser or electrodiathermy, performance of intraoperative cholangiogram, positive intraoperative cholangiogram, intraoperative common bile duct exploration, presence of a grossly inflamed gall bladder as seen by the surgeon intraoperatively and success of the operation, were analysed using multivariate logistic regression for predicting IGBP.
RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis against all 17 predictors was significant (chi(2) = 94.5, d.f. = 17, P = 0.0001), and the variables male sex, history of acute cholecystitis, use of laser and presence of a grossly inflamed gall bladder as seen by the surgeon intraoperatively were individually significant (P < 0.05) by the Wald chi(2)-test.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, using laser, in a male patient with a history of acute cholecystitis or during an acute attack of cholecystitis is associated with a significantly higher incidence of IGBP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16626349     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03669.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of the clinical and inflammatory responses in exclusively NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic routes: an experimental study in swine.

Authors:  Josiel P Vieira; Marcelo M Linhares; Elesiário M Caetano; Rita M A Moura; Vitor Asseituno; Rogério Fuzyi; Manoel J B Girão; José M Ruano; Alberto Goldenberg; Gaspar de Jesus L Filho; Délcio Matos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Routine intraoperative aspiration of gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Calik; S Topaloglu; S Topcu; S Turkyilmaz; U Kucuktulu; B Piskin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Retroperitoneal abscess with consecutive acute renal failure caused by a lost gallstone 2 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Christoph Justinger; Jens Sperling; Marcus Katoh; Otto Kollmar; Martin K Schilling; Jochen Schuld
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Open Cholecystectomy Has a Place in the Laparoscopic Era: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ayman El Nakeeb; Youssef Mahdy; Aly Salem; Mohamed El Sorogy; Ahmed Abd El Rafea; Mohamed El Dosoky; Rami Said; Mohamed Abd Ellatif; Mohamed M A Alsayed
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 0.656

5.  Gallbladder perforation during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes.

Authors:  Yunus Emre Altuntas; Mustafa Oncel; Mustafa Haksal; Metin Kement; Ersin Gundogdu; Nihat Aksakal; Fazli Cem Gezen
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2018-01-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.