Literature DB >> 16626267

Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors' opinion regarding clinical input in the preclinical years: the 2002 CDIM basic science survey results.

Kevin O'Brien1, Lynn Crespo, Paul Wallach, Michael Elnicki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Input from both basic science and clinical faculty members is needed to promote further integration of medical curricula.
PURPOSE: To assess current views of clerkship directors about the role and relationship of the basic sciences to clinical years in medical education.
METHODS: As part of the 2002 Annual CDIM Survey, questions regarding basic science curriculum were included; 89 of 123 CDIM members responded (72%).
RESULTS: Overall, respondents felt participation from both basic science and clinical faculty members is necessary to define basic science course content. Nearly 89% of clerkship directors indicated curricular review should be collaborative and interdepartmental; 93% felt that this review effort should occur frequently. Supporting the growing philosophy that the structure of the preclinical years should involve increased clinically relevant integration, 58% favored an integrated organ system approach rather than the traditional departmental structure (18%). In addition, in order of ranking, respondents felt that small group (M = 2.0 +/- 0.9) and problem-based learning (M = 2.1 +/- 1.1) are better approaches than the standard lecture format (M = 2.8 +/- 1.2). Although clerkship directors recognized the need for increased clinical input in the preclinical years, many reported a lack of knowledge regarding the amount of clinical exposure students received in the basic science years (33%), frequency of peer review of the basic science courses (20%), and who performed peer review of the basic science courses at their institution (36%).
CONCLUSION: Medical clerkship directors believe that basic science education should be developed collaboratively, organized by organ system, and presented in small groups.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16626267     DOI: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1802_3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Teach Learn Med        ISSN: 1040-1334            Impact factor:   2.414


  2 in total

1.  Retention of basic sciences knowledge at clinical years of medical curriculum.

Authors:  Elvira Lazić; Josip Dujmović; Darko Hren
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.351

2.  Basic Medical Sciences Knowledge Retention for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Bahiru Tenaw Goshu
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2022-05-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.