Literature DB >> 16625797

Understanding and minimizing epidemiologic bias in public health research.

Bernard C K Choi1, Anita W P Pak.   

Abstract

Awareness of potential biases is important for both researchers and policy-makers in public health: for researchers when designing and conducting studies, and for policy-makers when reading study reports and making decisions. This paper explains the meaning and importance of epidemiologic bias in public health and discusses how it arises and what can be done to minimize it. Examples of counting participants in a meeting, to which many policy-makers can relate, are used throughout the paper to illustrate bias in general, random error and systematic error, the effect of sample size, the three main categories of bias (selection, information and confounding), stratification and mathematical modeling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16625797      PMCID: PMC6976244     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Public Health        ISSN: 0008-4263


  7 in total

1.  Look before you leap: stratify before you standardize.

Authors:  B C Choi; N A de Guia; P Walsh
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Bias.

Authors:  Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez; Javier Llorca
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Classification, direction, and prevention of bias in epidemiologic research.

Authors:  B C Choi; A L Noseworthy
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1992-03

4.  Bias in analytic research.

Authors:  D L Sackett
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1979

Review 5.  Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume II--The design and analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  N E Breslow; N E Day
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1987

6.  Methodological issues in case-control studies IV: Validity and efficiency of various analysis strategies for continuous variables using the unconditional logistic regression model.

Authors:  B C Choi; G R Howe
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume I - The analysis of case-control studies.

Authors:  N E Breslow; N E Day
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1980
  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Vision for a global registry of anticipated public health studies.

Authors:  Bernard C K Choi; John Frank; Jennifer S Mindell; Anna Orlova; Vivian Lin; Alain D M G Vaillancourt; Pekka Puska; Tikki Pang; Harvey A Skinner; Marsha Marsh; Ali H Mokdad; Shun-Zhang Yu; M Cristina Lindner; Gregory Sherman; Sandhi M Barreto; Lawrence W Green; Lawrence W Svenson; Peter Sainsbury; Yongping Yan; Zuo-Feng Zhang; Juan C Zevallos; Suzanne C Ho; Ligia M de Salazar
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Selection bias in population-based cancer case-control studies due to incomplete sampling frame coverage.

Authors:  Matthew C Walsh; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Ronald E Gangnon; F Javier Nieto; Polly A Newcomb; Mari Palta
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Assessing generalisability through the use of disease registers: findings from a diabetes cohort study.

Authors:  Michael David; Robert Ware; Maria Donald; Rosa Alati
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  How is rating of perceived capacity related to VO2max and what is VO2max at onset of training?

Authors:  Christina Gjestvang; Trine Stensrud; Lene A H Haakstad
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2017-07-06

5.  Questionnaire Survey of Burnout Amongst Dentists in Singapore.

Authors:  Surinder Arora; Alec Knight
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.607

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.