Literature DB >> 16625688

Anterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: historic prospective study.

Miljenko Franić1, Vladimir Kovac.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the results of anterior instrumentation and standard posterior procedure for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.
METHODS: The study included 50 patients with adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis who underwent corrective spinal surgery. Anterior spinal fusion by use of modified Zielke ventral derotation system (anterior approach to spine through thorax) was performed in 25 patients, whereas posterior approach was used in 25 patients. The average preoperative thoracic curve in coronal plane was 66.7 +/- 9.9 degrees and 65.0 +/- 11.7 degrees in the anterior and posterior correction groups, respectively. The median age of patients before surgery was 14 years (range, 12-18) in the anterior and 16 years (range, 13-18) in the posterior correction group. Women-to-men ratio was 22 to 3 in each group. Coronal and sagittal correction, apical vertebral body rotation, rib hump, and rib depression correction were measured before surgery and at the first (30 days after surgery) and at the second follow-up visit (at least 2 years after surgery). Posteroanterior and laterolateral radiographs of the erect spine were used (according to the method of Cobb and Nash-Moe) to assess coronal, sagittal, and horizontal plane corrections. Rib hump and rib depression were measured with Thulbourne-Gillespie measuring device. The differences in scoliosis correction parameters in the two groups were tested with Student two-tailed t test.
RESULTS: In the coronal plane, the thoracic curve of 66.7 +/- 9.9 degrees before surgery in the anterior correction group was reduced to 14.8 +/- 8.7 degrees after surgery (78.1 +/- 12.4% relative correction), and the curve of 65.0 +/- 11.7 degrees in the posterior correction group was corrected to 29.2 +/- 7.8 degrees after surgery (55.1 +/- 8.6% relative correction) (P<0.001). Apical vertebral body rotation correction according to the Nash-Moe classification from 2.0 +/- 0.4 degrees to 0.8 +/- 0.6 degrees was achieved in the anterior correction group (62.0 +/- 26.6% relative correction) and from 1.7 +/- 0.5 degrees to 1.4 +/- 0.5 degrees in the posterior correction group (12.0 +/- 21.8% relative correction) (P<0.001). Rib hump correction from 22.4 +/- 15.5 mm to 5.4 +/- 5.2 mm was found in the anterior correction group (70.9 +/- 26.0% relative correction) and from 25.3 +/- 7.0 mm to 13.6 +/- 6.8 mm (48.4 +/- 16.5% relative correction) in the posterior correction group (P = 0.084).
CONCLUSION: Compared with the standard posterior approach, the anterior approach resulted in better three-dimensional correction of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16625688      PMCID: PMC2080403     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Croat Med J        ISSN: 0353-9504            Impact factor:   1.351


  24 in total

1.  Sagittal plane analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of anterior versus posterior instrumentation.

Authors:  John M Rhee; Keith H Bridwell; Douglas S Won; Lawrence G Lenke; Chatupon Chotigavanichaya; Darrell S Hanson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Y Cotrel; J Dubousset; M Guillaumat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Anterior approach to scoliosis. Results of treatment in fifty-one cases.

Authors:  A F Dwyer; M F Schafer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1974-05

4.  Screening school children for scoliosis.

Authors:  T S Renshaw
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Segmental spinal instrumentation for correction of scoliosis.

Authors:  E R Luque
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Anterior single-rod instrumentation of the thoracic and lumbar spine: saving levels.

Authors:  Thomas G Lowe; Randal Betz; Lawrence Lenke; David Clements; Jürgen Harms; Peter Newton; Thomas Haher; Andrew Merola; Dennis Wenger
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The rib hump in idiopathic scoliosis. Measurement, analysis and response to treatment.

Authors:  T Thulbourne; R Gillespie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1976-02

8.  Long-term anatomic and functional changes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by Harrington rod fusion.

Authors:  T Cochran; L Irstam; A Nachemson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Prevention of the complications of scoliosis by early detection.

Authors:  R E McCarthy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Ventral derotation spondylodesis. A review of 22 cases.

Authors:  D M Ogiela; D P Chan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Spinal manipulation after multiple fusions in an adult with scoliosis: a case report.

Authors:  Christina Cuka; Amy W McDevitt; Ann Porter-Hoke; Steve Karas
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2019-01-13

2.  Effectiveness and safety of surgical interventions for treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Long Chen; Zeyu Sun; Jingming He; Yunwen Xu; Zhuhai Li; Qian Zou; Bo Li
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.362

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.