Literature DB >> 16625587

Oxcarbazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy.

M Muller1, A G Marson, P R Williamson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, phenytoin is a commonly used antiepileptic drug. Oxcarbazepine is one of the newer antiepileptic drugs and has similar chemical properties to its parent compound carbamazepine. For the new drugs such as oxcarbazepine, it is important to know how they compare with standard treatments.
OBJECTIVES: To review the best evidence comparing oxcarbazepine and phenytoin when used as monotherapy in patients with epilepsy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialized Register (December 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2005), and MEDLINE (1966 to November 2005). No language restrictions were imposed. We checked the reference lists of retrieved studies for additional reports of relevant studies. We also contacted pharmaceutical companies to try and identify any unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials in children or adults with epilepsy. Trials must have included a comparison of oxcarbazepine monotherapy with phenytoin monotherapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: This was an individual patient data review. Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Outcomes were (a) time on allocated treatment; (b) time to achieve 6, 12 and 24-month remission; (c) time to first seizure post randomization; (d) quality of life measures if available. Clinical heterogeneity was assessed by reviewing differences across trials in characteristics of randomized patients, dosing protocols and trial design. Data were analysed on an intention to treat basis. Stratified logrank tests were used to obtain study-specific and overall estimates of hazard ratios (with 95% confidence intervals), where a HR > 1 indicates that an event is more likely on phenytoin. MAIN
RESULTS: Individual patient data were available for 480 patients from two trials, representing 100% of the patients recruited into the two trials that met our inclusion criteria. By convention, for the outcomes time to withdrawal of allocated treatment and time to first seizure a hazards ratio (HR) > 1 indicates a clinical advantage for oxcarbazepine and for time to 6 and 12-month remission a HR > 1 indicates a clinical advantage for phenytoin. The main overall results (HR, 95% confidence interval (CI)) were: (i) time to withdrawal of allocated treatment 1.64 (1.09 to 2.47), (ii) time to 6-month remission 0.89 (0.66 to 1.22), (iii) time to 12-month remission 0.92 (0.62 to 1.37), (iv) time to first seizure 1.07 (0.83 to 1.39). The overall results indicate that oxcarbazepine is significantly better than phenytoin for time to treatment withdrawal, but suggest no overall difference between oxcarbazepine and phenytoin for other outcomes. Results stratified by seizure type indicate no significant advantage for either drug for patients with generalized onset seizures, but a potentially important advantage in time to withdrawal for oxcarbazepine for patients with partial onset seizures: HR 1.92 (95% CI 1.17 to 3.16). The age distribution of adults classified as having generalized epilepsy suggests a significant number of patients may have had their epilepsy misclassified. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with partial onset seizures oxcarbazepine is significantly less likely to be withdrawn, but current data do not allow a statement as to whether oxcarbazepine is equivalent, superior or inferior to phenytoin in terms of seizure control. Guidelines recommend carbamazepine as a first line treatment for patients with partial onset seizures and more evidence is needed regarding the comparative effects of oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine to further inform policy. For patients with generalized onset tonic-clonic seizures, valproate is considered the first line standard treatment and the results of this review do not inform current treatment policy. Misclassification of patients' epilepsy type may have confounded the results of this review.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16625587     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003615.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  10 in total

Review 1.  Epilepsy (generalised).

Authors:  Melissa Maguire; Anthony G Marson; Sridharan Ramaratnam
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2012-02-20

Review 2.  CNS adverse events associated with antiepileptic drugs.

Authors:  Gina M Kennedy; Samden D Lhatoo
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 3.  Pharmacotherapy of focal epilepsy in children: a systematic review of approved agents.

Authors:  Ravindra Arya; Tracy A Glauser
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  Treatment options for refractory and difficult to treat seizures: focus on vigabatrin.

Authors:  Justin A Tolman; Michele A Faulkner
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 5.  Exploring changes over time and characteristics associated with data retrieval across individual participant data meta-analyses: systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah J Nevitt; Anthony G Marson; Becky Davie; Sally Reynolds; Lisa Williams; Catrin Tudur Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-04-05

6.  Efficacy and safety of oxcarbazepine in the treatment of children with epilepsy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hua Geng; Chengzhong Wang
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.570

7.  Antiepileptic drug monotherapy: the initial approach in epilepsy management.

Authors:  Erik K St Louis; William E Rosenfeld; Thomas Bramley
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.363

8.  Oxcarbazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.

Authors:  Sarah J Nevitt; Catrin Tudur Smith; Anthony G Marson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-23

9.  Multiple treatment comparisons in epilepsy monotherapy trials.

Authors:  Catrin Tudur Smith; Anthony G Marson; David W Chadwick; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Sharing individual participant data from clinical trials: an opinion survey regarding the establishment of a central repository.

Authors:  Catrin Tudur Smith; Kerry Dwan; Douglas G Altman; Mike Clarke; Richard Riley; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.