Literature DB >> 16625128

Do-not-resuscitate decisions in six European countries.

Johannes J M van Delden1, Rurik Löfmark, Luc Deliens, Georg Bosshard, Michael Norup, Riccardo Cecioni, Agnes van der Heide.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study and compare the incidence and main background characteristics of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decision making in six European countries.
DESIGN: Retrospective.
SETTING: We studied DNR decisions simultaneously in Belgium (Flanders), Denmark, Italy (four regions), the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland (German-speaking part). In each country, random samples of death certificates were drawn from death registries to which all deaths are reported. The deaths occurred between June 2001 and February 2002. PARTICIPANTS: Reporting physicians received a mailed questionnaire about the medical decision making that had preceded death. The response percentage was 75% for the Netherlands, 67% for Switzerland, 62% for Denmark, 61% for Sweden, 59% for Belgium, and 44% for Italy. The total number of deaths studied was 20,480.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Measurements were frequency of DNR decisions, both individual and institutional, and patient involvement. Before death, an individual DNR decision was made in about 50-60% of all nonsudden deaths (Switzerland 73%, Italy 16%). The frequency of institutional decisions was highest in Sweden (22%) and Italy (17%) and lowest in Belgium (5%). DNR decisions are discussed with competent patients in 10-84% of cases. In the Netherlands patient involvement rose from 53% in 1990 to 84% in 2001. In case of incompetent patients, physicians bypassed relatives in 5-37% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Except in Italy, DNR decisions are a common phenomenon in these six countries. Most of these decisions are individual, but institutional decisions occur frequently as well. In most countries, the involvement of patients in DNR decision making can be improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16625128     DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000218417.51292.A7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  12 in total

1.  Noninvasive ventilation in patients with "do-not-intubate" orders: medium-term efficacy depends critically on patient selection.

Authors:  Rafael Fernandez; Francisco Baigorri; Antonio Artigas
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Old age and poor prognosis increase the likelihood of disagreement between cancer patients and their oncologists on the indication for resuscitation attempt.

Authors:  Lena Saltbaek; Hanne M Michelsen; Knud M Nelausen; Rikke Gut; Dorte L Nielsen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Evaluating a patient's request for life-prolonging treatment: an ethical framework.

Authors:  Eva C Winkler; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Georg Marckmann
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Variability in the pediatric intensivists' threshold for withdrawal/limitation of life support as perceived by bedside nurses: a multicenter survey study.

Authors:  Colleen S Gresiuk; Ari R Joffe
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 6.925

5.  Donation after cardiocirculatory death: a call for a moratorium pending full public disclosure and fully informed consent.

Authors:  Ari R Joffe; Joe Carcillo; Natalie Anton; Allan deCaen; Yong Y Han; Michael J Bell; Frank A Maffei; John Sullivan; James Thomas; Gonzalo Garcia-Guerra
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.464

6.  The attitude of Iranian nurses about do not resuscitate orders.

Authors:  Sima Mogadasian; Farahnaz Abdollahzadeh; Azad Rahmani; Caleb Ferguson; Fermisk Pakanzad; Vahid Pakpour; Hamid Heidarzadeh
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2014-01

7.  End-of-life medical decisions in France: a death certificate follow-up survey 5 years after the 2005 act of parliament on patients' rights and end of life.

Authors:  Sophie Pennec; Alain Monnier; Silvia Pontone; Régis Aubry
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 3.234

8.  Physicians' experiences with end-of-life decision-making: survey in 6 European countries and Australia.

Authors:  Rurik Löfmark; Tore Nilstun; Colleen Cartwright; Susanne Fischer; Agnes van der Heide; Freddy Mortier; Michael Norup; Lorenzo Simonato; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Themes and variations: An exploratory international investigation into resuscitation decision-making.

Authors:  Alexander J O Gibbs; Alexandra C Malyon; Zoë B McC Fritz
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 5.262

10.  Low adherence to legislation regarding Do-Not-Attempt-Cardiopulmonary-Resuscitation orders in a Swedish University Hospital.

Authors:  Eva Piscator; Therese Djärv; Katarina Rakovic; Emil Boström; Sune Forsberg; Martin J Holzmann; Johan Herlitz; Katarina Göransson
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.