Literature DB >> 16624777

[Learning curve of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer].

Guo-xin Li1, Hong-tao Yan, Jiang Yu, Shang-tong Lei, Qi Xue, Xia Cheng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer and to investigate how surgeons without previous training of laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) can quickly learn laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer.
METHODS: Clinical data of 105 cases of laparoscopic rectal resection performed by a group of surgeons without previous training of LC were reviewed. The cases were divided equally into 3 groups (groups A, B and C) according to the sequence of the operations. The operating time, blood loss, lymph node harvest, length of specimen, conversion rate to open surgery, intra- and postoperative complications and hospital stay were compared between the 3 groups.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the 3 groups with respect to age, gender, Dukes'stage or surgical approach (P>0.05). The operating time in group A was 196.1+/-30.3 min, significantly longer than that in group B (164.8+/-22.7 min) and group C (158.7+/-20.9 min) (P<0.001), but the operating time did not vary significantly between groups B and C (P>0.05). The blood loss was significantly greater in group A than in groups B and C (72.4+/-21.5, 48.2+/-16.3, and 46.6+/-15.4 ml, respectively, P<0.001), but showed no significant difference between the latter two groups (P>0.05). The rate of conversion to open surgery decreased from 11.4% in group A to 2.9% in group B and group C, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The rate of intraoperative complications declined from 17.1% in group A to 5.7% in group B and group C, showing no significant difference either. The lymph node harvest, length of specimen, and postoperative complications showed no significant variation between the 3 groups (P>0.05), but group C had significantly shorter mean hospital stay in comparison with groups A and B (P<0.001). The 35 patients in group A received the operation within a time period of 17 months (2.1 cases per month), and operations in groups B and C were done in 7 months (5 cases per month).
CONCLUSION: The learning curve of laparoscopic rectal resections is approximately 35 cases, and the surgeons without previous experience of laparoscopic cholecystectomy can learn the surgical skills after performing 35 laparoscopic resections for rectal cancer at the monthly frequency of 2.1 cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16624777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao        ISSN: 1673-4254


  7 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in China: an overview.

Authors:  Ketao Jin; Jun Wang; Huanrong Lan; Ruili Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

2.  Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Jiejing Qiu; Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Annibale D'Annibale; Graziano Pernazza; Igor Monsellato; Vito Pende; Giorgio Lucandri; Paolo Mazzocchi; Giovanni Alfano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies.

Authors:  Philipp Kirchhoff; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2010-03-25

5.  Elective and emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly: our experience.

Authors:  Alessia G Ferrarese; Mario Solej; Stefano Enrico; Alessandro Falcone; Silvia Catalano; Giada Pozzi; Silvia Marola; Valter Martino
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic operation in anus-preserving rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yongzhen Cui; Cheng Li; Zhongfa Xu; Yingming Wang; Yamei Sun; Huirong Xu; Zengjun Li; Yanlai Sun
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Laparoscopic vs open colorectal surgery: Economic and clinical outcomes in the Brazilian healthcare.

Authors:  Ulysses Ribeiro; Daiane Oliveira Tayar; Rodrigo Antonini Ribeiro; Priscila Andrade; Silvio Mauro Junqueira
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.