Literature DB >> 16624215

Results and outcomes after operative treatment of high-energy tibial plafond fractures.

A Michael Harris1, Brendan M Patterson, John K Sontich, Heather A Vallier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results and the functional outcomes after operative treatment of tibial plafond fractures treated with internal or external fixation.
METHODS: A retrospective review identified 76 patients with 79 fractures (OTA 43-B or 43-C) of the tibial plafond. Their average age was 45 years. Twenty-one fractures (27%) were open, and 43 (54%) were type 43-C3. Five were type 43-B1, four were 43-B2, two were 43-B3, 15 were 43-C1, and 10 were 43-C2. Patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (n = 63) or limited open articular reduction and wire ring external fixation (EF) (n = 16). Tibial fixation was performed at a mean of 7.6 days after injury, with staged reconstruction in 56 fractures (71%). Bone graft was used initially in 32 fractures (41%). Early and late complications, secondary procedures, and radiographic evidence of post-traumatic arthritis were evaluated. Foot Function Index (FFI) and Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) questionnaires were administered.
RESULTS: Seventy-nine fractures were followed clinically and radiographically for a mean of 26 (range 24 to 38) months, and 33 patients completed outcomes questionnaires at a mean of 98 months after surgery. Early complications included two superficial wound problems and three deep infections. Late complications included two nonunions and four malunions. Thirty-one fractures (39%) developed post-traumatic arthritis. Complications occurred after six of 21 open fractures and after 11 of 43 type C3 fractures (p = 0.007). Patients treated with EF more frequently had type C3 fractures (88% versus 46%, p = 0.004) compared with patients treated with ORIF. The EF patients developed more complications (six of 16, p = 0.007) and post-traumatic arthritis (11 of 16, p = 0.01) when compared with ORIF. Patients treated with EF (88% were type C3 fractures) had lower FFI and MFA scores. The greatest impairment in outcome was noted after type C3 fractures, regardless of the method of treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Tibial plafond fractures are difficult to manage and may have serious complications. We identified more complications, more secondary procedures, and worse outcomes in patients with articular and metaphyseal comminution (type C3). ORIF was associated with fewer complications and less post-traumatic arthritis when compared to EF, possibly reflecting a selection bias for open injuries and more severely comminuted fractures to be managed with EF. ORIF with appropriate soft tissue handling resulted in acceptable results in most patients. Severely damaged soft tissues and highly comminuted C3 fractures may be safely treated with EF. Loss of function and progression to post-traumatic arthritis are common after tibial plafond fractures. Assessment of long-term results and the efficacy of additional reconstructive procedures will refine the treatment algorithms for these fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16624215     DOI: 10.1177/107110070602700406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  22 in total

1.  Functional outcomes of the failed plate fixation in distal tibial fractures salvaged by hexapod external fixator.

Authors:  Maketo Molepo; Annette-Christi Barnard; Franz Birkholtz; Kevin Tetsworth; Vaida Glatt; Erik Hohmann
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-05-24

2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following external fixation or open reduction internal fixation for distal intra-articular tibial fractures: an update.

Authors:  J L Erichsen; P I Andersen; B Viberg; C Jensen; F Damborg; L Froberg
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-02-09

3.  Outcome of 28 open pilon fractures with injury severity-based fixation.

Authors:  Jonathan R Danoff; Comron Saifi; David C Goodspeed; J Spence Reid
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-09-26

4.  Staged treatment of pilon fractures.

Authors:  Chenthuran Deivaraju; Richard Vlasak; Kalia Sadasivan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-02-27

5.  The sequential recovery of health status after tibial plafond fractures.

Authors:  J Lawrence Marsh; Todd McKinley; Douglas Dirschl; Andrew Pick; Geoffrey Haft; Donald D Anderson; Thomas Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 6.  High-energy tibial pilon fractures: an instructional review.

Authors:  Boris A Zelle; Khang H Dang; Samuel S Ornell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Management of high-energy foot and ankle injuries in the geriatric population.

Authors:  Dolfi Herscovici; Julia M Scaduto
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2012-03

8.  CT assessment of the prevalence of retinacular injuries associated with hindfoot fractures.

Authors:  Julia Crim; Michael Enslow; Joshua Smith
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  A review of the foot function index and the foot function index - revised.

Authors:  Elly Budiman-Mak; Kendon J Conrad; Jessica Mazza; Rodney M Stuck
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Injury mechanism, fracture characteristics and clinical treatment of pilon fracture with intact fibula-A retrospective study of 23 pilon fractures.

Authors:  Jiang Liangjun; Zheng Qiang; Li Hang; Pan Zhijun
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.