Literature DB >> 16623730

Biological control agents elevate hantavirus by subsidizing deer mouse populations.

Dean E Pearson, Ragan M Callaway.   

Abstract

Biological control of exotic invasive plants using exotic insects is practiced under the assumption that biological control agents are safe if they do not directly attack non-target species. We tested this assumption by evaluating the potential for two host-specific biological control agents (Urophora spp.), widely established in North America for spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa) control, to indirectly elevate Sin Nombre hantavirus by providing food subsidies to populations of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus), the primary reservoir for the virus. We show that seropositive deer mice (mice testing positive for hantavirus) were over three times more abundant in the presence of the biocontrol food subsidy. Elevating densities of seropositive mice may increase risk of hantavirus infection in humans and significantly alter hantavirus ecology. Host specificity alone does not ensure safe biological control. To minimize indirect risks to non-target species, biological control agents must suppress pest populations enough to reduce their own numbers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16623730     DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00896.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  10 in total

1.  Exotic plant invasion in the context of plant defense against herbivores.

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Invasive honeysuckle eradication reduces tick-borne disease risk by altering host dynamics.

Authors:  Brian F Allan; Humberto P Dutra; Lisa S Goessling; Kirk Barnett; Jonathan M Chase; Robert J Marquis; Genevieve Pang; Gregory A Storch; Robert E Thach; John L Orrock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Invasive plant architecture alters trophic interactions by changing predator abundance and behavior.

Authors:  Dean E Pearson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Evaluating unintended consequences of intentional species introductions and eradications for improved conservation management.

Authors:  Dean E Pearson; Tyler J Clark; Philip G Hahn
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 7.563

5.  Potential role of masting by introduced bamboos in deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) population irruptions holds public health consequences.

Authors:  Melissa C Smith; Richard Gomulkiewicz; Richard N Mack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Climate warming increases biological control agent impact on a non-target species.

Authors:  Xinmin Lu; Evan Siemann; Minyan He; Hui Wei; Xu Shao; Jianqing Ding
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  A damped precipitation-driven, bottom-up model for deer mouse population abundance in the northwestern United States.

Authors:  Irene L Gorosito; Richard J Douglass
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Evolution and biological control.

Authors:  George K Roderick; Ruth Hufbauer; Maria Navajas
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 5.183

Review 9.  Release of genetically engineered insects: a framework to identify potential ecological effects.

Authors:  Aaron S David; Joe M Kaser; Amy C Morey; Alexander M Roth; David A Andow
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Impact of cyber-invasive species on a large ecological network.

Authors:  Anna Doizy; Edmund Barter; Jane Memmott; Karen Varnham; Thilo Gross
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.