Literature DB >> 16623004

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectosigmoid and rectal cancer.

Chucheep Sahakitrungruang1, Jirawat Pattana-arun, Kasaya Tantiphlachiva, Arun Rojanasakul.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer and rectal cancer. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: Twenty four patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer or rectal cancer were retrospectively evaluated. Results were compared with those of 25 patients who had open surgery at the same period. The procedures of both groups were anterior resection, low anterior resection, coloanal anastomosis, abdominoperineal resection and subtotal colectomy.
RESULTS: The mean operative time was significantly increased in the laparoscopic group. However, this group showed faster recovery of bowel function. There were no differences in the distal margin and yield of harvested lymph nodes of resected specimens. Although anastomotic leakage was comparable between 2 groups, surgical wound infection was significantly higher in open surgery group.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer and rectal cancer is feasible and can be performed safely with comparable oncological clearance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16623004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai        ISSN: 0125-2208


  2 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancers: Current status.

Authors:  Parul J Shukla; George Barreto; Piyush Gupta; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.407

Review 2.  Current Colorectal Cancer in Thailand.

Authors:  Varut Lohsiriwat; Nopdanai Chaisomboon; Jirawat Pattana-Arun
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2020-01-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.