| Literature DB >> 16622440 |
L Tao1, M Lefèvre, S Ricci, P Saintigny, P Callard, S Périé, R Lacave, J-F Bernaudin, J Lacau St Guily.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the occult lymph node carcinomatous diffusion in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). A total of 1328 lymph nodes from 31 patients treated between 2004 and 2005 were prospectively evaluated by routine haematoxylin-eosin-safran (HES) staining, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and real-time Taqman reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR) assay. Amplification of cytokeratin 19 (CK19) mRNA transcripts using real-time RT-PCR was used to quantify cervical micrometastatic burden. The cervical lymph node metastatic rates determined by routine HES staining and real-time RT-PCR assay were 16.3 and 36.0%, respectively (P<0.0001). A potential change in the nodal status was observed in 13 (42.0%) of the 31 patients and an atypical pattern of lymphatic spread was identified in four patients (12.9%). Moreover, CK19 mRNA expression values in histologically positive lymph nodes were significantly higher than those observed in histologically negative lymph nodes (P<0.0001). These results indicate that real-time RT-PCR assay for the detection of CK19 mRNA is a sensitive and reliable method for the detection of carcinomatous cells in lymph nodes. This type of method could be used to reassess lymph node status according to occult lymphatic spread in patients with HNSCC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16622440 PMCID: PMC2361256 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603073
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Characteristics of patients with HNSCC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 7 | 6 | 17 | 1 |
| Age | 55.7±5.7 | 69.0±5.5 | 57.4±9.7 | 64 |
|
| ||||
| Male | 5 | 5 | 14 | 0 |
| Female | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
|
| ||||
| T1–2 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 0 |
| T3–4 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 |
|
| ||||
| N0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 1 |
| N1–3 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 0 |
|
| ||||
| Total (%) | 301 (22.7%) | 226 (17.0%) | 755 (56.9%) | 46 (3.4%) |
| Positive (HES) | 6 (2.0%) | 2 (0.9%) | 25 (3.3%) | 0 (0%) |
HES=haematoxylin–eosin–safran; HNSCC=head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
% of all lymph nodes collected.
After usual histopathologic examination.
Figure 1Amplification of CK19 mRNA by real-time RT–PCR assay (iCycler iQ). (A) Amplification plots of four 10-fold serial dilutions of the standard CK19 mRNA from CAPAN-1 cells total RNA. The initial amount of total mRNA is displayed: 2.5 × 104, 2.5 × 103, 2.5 × 102 and 25 pg. Threshold cycle (Ct) is calculated as the cycle at which fluorescence signal exceeds a fixed threshold line. (B) Standard curve of real-time RT–PCR CK19 assay. Ct is plotted against the starting quantity of CAPAN-1 cell total RNA.
Results of histopathologic examination and CK19 mRNA real-time RT–PCR in the various cervical lymph node levels expressed as the number of positive levels/total number of levels investigated
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Level I | 2/10 | 4/10 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/12 | 4/12 |
| Level IIa | 1/9 | 5/9 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 9/24 | 12/24 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 12/40 | 18/40 |
| Level IIb | 0/9 | 7/9 | 0/7 | 2/7 | 5/23 | 9/23 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 6/41 | 18/41 |
| Level III | 0/9 | 2/9 | 0/7 | 1/7 | 6/24 | 8/24 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 6/42 | 11/42 |
| Level IV | 0/7 | 2/7 | 0/7 | 2/7 | 1/23 | 7/23 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 1/39 | 11/39 |
| Level V | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/3 | 2/3 |
| Level VI | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| Total | 5/44 | 20/44 | 2/29 | 7/29 | 22/97 | 37/97 | 0/8 | 0/8 | 29/178 | 64/178 |
| % | 11.4 | 45.5 | 6.9 | 24.1 | 22.7 | 38.1 | 0 | 0 | 16.3 | 36.0 |
CK19=cytokeratin 19; HES=haematoxylin–eosin–safran; RT–PCR=reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction.
Neck dissection samples have been categorised according to the topographic classification of cervical lymph node levels proposed by Robbins .
Difference between HES and real-time RT–PCR results, P<0.0001.
Results of histopathologic and molecular node status in patients with unilateral neck dissection
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 50/M | Oral cavity | 0 | 2b | — | Ia, IIb |
| 57/M | Hypopharynx | 0 | 2b | — | IIa, IIb |
| 75/M | Oropharynx | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| 69/M | Oropharynx | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| 52/M | Hypopharynx | 2 | 2a | IIa | IIa |
| 58/M | Hypopharynx | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| 73/M | Oropharynx | 0 | 2b | — | IIb, IV |
| 74/M | Hypopharynx | 2b | 2b | IIa, IIb | IIa, IIb |
| 69/M | Hypopharynx | 2b | 2b | III | III |
| 50/F | Oral cavity | 1 | 2b | IIa | IIa, III |
| 50/M | Hypopharynx | 1 | 1 | IIa | IIa |
| 64/F | Oropharynx | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| 54/M | Hypopharynx | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| 41/M | Hypopharynx | 1 | 2b | III | IIa, IIb, III, IV |
| 72/M | Oropharynx | 1 | 2b | V | IV, V |
| 51/M | Oral cavity | 2b | 2b | Ib | Ia, Ib, IIa, IIb |
| 69/M | Hypopharynx | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| 55/M | Hypopharynx | 2b | 2b | IIa, III | IIa, III |
| 64/M | Oral cavity | 0 | 1 | — | IIb |
| 61/M | Oral cavity | 0 | 2b | — | IIa, IIb |
RT–PCR=reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction.
Pathologic lymph node staging according to histopathologic examination; —indicates the absence of detected carcinomatous cells.
Molecular lymph node staging according to real-time RT–PCR detection of CK19 mRNA.
Neck dissection samples have been categorised according to the topographic classification of the cervical lymph node levels proposed by Robbins .
Change in nodal status according to real-time RT–PCR CK19 results.
Results of histopathologic and molecular node status in patients with bilateral neck dissections
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 61/M | Oropharynx | 2a | 2b | IIa | IIa, IIb, III | — | — |
| 66/F | Hypopharynx | 2c | 2c | IIa, IIb, III | IIa, IIb, III | IIa | IIa, III, IV |
| 68/M | Hypopharynx | 2b | 2b | IV, V | IV, V | — | — |
| 63/M | Hypopharynx | 0 | 2c | — | III, IV | — | IV |
| 53/M | Hypopharynx | 2c | 2c | IIa | IIa, IIb | III | III |
| 64/F | Larynx | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
| 40/M | Hypopharynx | 2c | 2c | IIb, III | IIb, III | IIa, IIb | IIa, IIb |
| 55/M | Oral Cavity | 2b | 2b | — | — | Ib, IIa, IIb | Ib, IIa, IIb |
| 59/F | Oral Cavity | 0 | 2c | — | IIa, IIb, IV | — | IIb, III, IV |
| 52/F | Hypopharynx | 0 | 2c | — | IIa, IV | — | IIa, IIb, IV |
| 55/F | Hypopharynx | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | IIb |
RT–PCR=reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction.
Pathologic lymph node staging according to histopathologic examination; —indicates the absence of detected carcinomatous cells.
Molecular lymph node staging according to detection of CK19 mRNA by real-time RT–PCR.
Neck dissection samples have been categorised prospectively according to the topographic classification of cervical lymph node levels proposed by Robbins (R: right; L: left).
Change in nodal status according to real-time RT–PCR CK19 results.
Figure 2RQ (relative quantification of CKmRNA copies) according to the equation: of CK19 mRNA expression in 64 lymph node levels (29 histopathologically positive; 35 histopathologically negative).
Figure 3Immunohistochemistry on lymph nodes containing carcinomatous cells detected after HES staining (right) after incubation with an anticytokeratin monoclonal antibody (left) (final magnification × 400).