Literature DB >> 16622381

Cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty: effect of preinjection gelfoam embolization.

Chandra Bhatia1, Yair Barzilay, Manoj Krishna, Tai Friesem, Raymond Pollock.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective case series.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety and feasibility of routine preinjection of gelfoam embolization during percutaneous vertebroplasty. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Percutaneous vertebroplasty has been used effectively in pain relief for vertebral fractures resulting from malignancy and osteoporosis. However, cement extrusion is a common problem and can lead to complications. Gelfoam embolization of venous channels before cement injection has not been widely used as a technique to prevent leakage.
METHODS: Thirty-one patients who met the inclusion-exclusion criteria for the study underwent percutaneous vertebroplasty. Venography was first performed to determine the flow pattern in the vertebrae and confirm needle placement. Next, routine gelfoam embolization of venous channels was performed. This was followed by low-pressure, minimal-volume cement injection. The outcome measure of cement leakage was assessed after surgery using radiographs and CT scans.
RESULTS: There were no complications. In the 31 patients, 61 levels of vertebroplasty were performed. Overall, there were 16 leaks out of 61 levels in 12 patients (26.2%). In osteoporotic fractures, there were 11 leaks in 49 levels, giving a leakage rate of 22.5%. There was only 1 epidural leak in this group (2%), and this was asymptomatic. Seven leakages were into the adjacent disc, 2 into the body, and 1 into the paravertebral tissues. In malignant fractures, there were 5 leakages out of 12 levels (41.7%). Of these, 2 were epidural leaks (16.7%), which were asymptomatic.
CONCLUSIONS: Complications resulting from leakage are the most feared side effect of the procedure. This has resulted in only limited application of vertebroplasty in the United Kingdom. Routine gelfoam embolization together with careful technique has been shown to be a safe and feasible method during vertebroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16622381     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000209307.03930.38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  17 in total

1.  Answer to the Letter to the Editor of HM Wang et al. concerning "A prospective randomized controlled study comparing the pain relief in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with the use of vertebroplasty or facet blocking" by Wang B, Guo H, Yuan L et al. Eur Spine J (2016): doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4425-4.

Authors:  Biao Wang; Hua Guo; Yuan Li; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Presentation and management of symptomatic central bone cement embolization.

Authors:  Ahmed Samir Barakat; Tamer Owais; Mohamed Alhashash; Mootaz Shousha; Hesham El Saghir; Bernward Lauer; Heinrich Boehm
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biomechanical characteristics of cement/gelatin mixture for prevention of cement leakage in vertebral augmentation.

Authors:  Bin Meng; Ming Qian; Shao-Xiang Xia; Hui-Lin Yang; Zong-Ping Luo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in the management of osteoporosis with subsequent vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Gemma Marcucci; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-01

5.  Minimum cement volume for vertebroplasty.

Authors:  David Martinčič; Miha Brojan; Franc Kosel; Darko Štern; Tomaž Vrtovec; Vane Antolič; Rok Vengust
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  High- versus low-viscosity cement vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qiang Wang; Changtai Sun; Liang Zhang; Lin Wang; Quan Ji; Nan Min; Zilong Yin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 2.721

7.  The clinical comparative study on high and low viscosity bone cement application in vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Teng-Hui Zeng; Yi-Ming Wang; Xin-Jian Yang; Jian-Yi Xiong; Dai-Qi Guo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

8.  CT-guided vertebroplasty in osteoprotic vertebral fractures: incidence of secondary fractures and impact of intradiscal cement leakages during follow-up.

Authors:  M B Pitton; S Herber; C Bletz; P Drees; N Morgen; U Koch; B Böhm; A Eckardt; C Düber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Unipedicular versus bipedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Liang Zhang; Zhongjun Liu; Jingcheng Wang; Xinmin Feng; Jiandong Yang; Yuping Tao; Shengfei Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Cement embolus trapped in the inferior vena cava filter during percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Rui-fang Ni; Xin Zhao; Chao Yang; Ming-ming Li
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.