Literature DB >> 16622360

Why we love quality but hate to measure it.

John Peabody1.   

Abstract

As a group, physicians strive for quality but often resist quality measurement. Cost, inconvenience, lack of time, mistrust of quality measures, and a fear of what assessment may find are all factors contributing to this resistance. However, quality, in both rich and poor counties, continues to be poor at worse and varied at best. If we are to improve the quality of our care, we need quality measurement to show us our weaknesses. A variety of tools are available to assess quality, which, when followed by the right policy interventions, can lead to improved care. Quality measurements are most effective when they are comparative, reflect the complexity of clinical practice, are not expected to be a panacea for spiraling costs, and are made available to our colleagues and our patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16622360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care        ISSN: 1063-8628            Impact factor:   0.926


  2 in total

1.  Translational research--implementation of NHLBI Obesity Guidelines in a primary care community setting: the Physician Obesity Awareness Project.

Authors:  R J Schuster; J Tasosa; N A Terwoord
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  Factors influencing measurement for improvement skills in healthcare staff: trainee, and trainer perspectives.

Authors:  Zuneera Khurshid; Aoife De Brún; Eilish McAuliffe
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 2.463

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.