M Luc1, T Pham, C Chagnaud, P Lafforgue, V Legré. 1. Rheumatology Department, Conception Hospital, 147 Boulevard Baille, 13005 Marseille, France. mathieu.luc@gmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop and to assess a simple, inexpensive method for ascertaining, without any imaging procedure, the intra-articular placement of the needle in the knee for intra-articular injections. METHODS: Outpatients referred for intra-articular treatment with "dry" symptomatic knee osteoarthritis were included in this prospective study. "Dry" knee disease was defined as a knee without any clinically detectable effusion. Once intra-articular positioning of the needle considered adequate using the backflow technique, contrast solution was injected using the same needle without changing its position and immediately afterwards lateral and anterior-posterior X-rays were taken to assess the needle position. RESULTS: Of the 32 of 33 cases with obtained backflow, the needle was correctly placed in all cases. In the remaining case, the needle was extra-articularly positioned. The concordance between the two techniques using the Cohen's Kappa was 1 [CI 95%: 0.22-1]. CONCLUSION: The backflow technique allows to accurate the intra-articular placement of the needle for "dry" knee joints injection. This technique can be proposed as a learning tool as well as a daily practice technique to ascertaining intra-articular knee injections without using fluoroscopy with injection of contrast material. Further studies are needed to assess the technique for other joint injections.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and to assess a simple, inexpensive method for ascertaining, without any imaging procedure, the intra-articular placement of the needle in the knee for intra-articular injections. METHODS: Outpatients referred for intra-articular treatment with "dry" symptomatic knee osteoarthritis were included in this prospective study. "Dry" knee disease was defined as a knee without any clinically detectable effusion. Once intra-articular positioning of the needle considered adequate using the backflow technique, contrast solution was injected using the same needle without changing its position and immediately afterwards lateral and anterior-posterior X-rays were taken to assess the needle position. RESULTS: Of the 32 of 33 cases with obtained backflow, the needle was correctly placed in all cases. In the remaining case, the needle was extra-articularly positioned. The concordance between the two techniques using the Cohen's Kappa was 1 [CI 95%: 0.22-1]. CONCLUSION: The backflow technique allows to accurate the intra-articular placement of the needle for "dry" knee joints injection. This technique can be proposed as a learning tool as well as a daily practice technique to ascertaining intra-articular knee injections without using fluoroscopy with injection of contrast material. Further studies are needed to assess the technique for other joint injections.
Authors: Seong Ho Jang; Sang Chul Lee; Ji Hae Lee; Sang Hyun Nam; Kyoung Rai Cho; Yongbum Park Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Nasimah Maricar; Matthew J Parkes; Michael J Callaghan; David T Felson; Terence W O'Neill Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 5.532