Literature DB >> 16621597

Participants who left a multiple-wave cohort study had similar baseline characteristics to participants who returned.

Robert S Ware1, Gail M Williams, Rosemary L Aird.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Research on determinants of an individual's pattern of response, considered as a profile across time, for cohort studies with multiple waves is limited. In this prospective population-based pregnancy cohort, we investigated baseline characteristics of participants after partitioning them according to their history of response to different interview waves.
METHODS: Data are from the Mater-University of Queensland Study of Pregnancy 1981 to 1983 cohort, Brisbane, Australia. Complete baseline information was collected for 7223 of 7535 eligible individuals (95.9%). Follow-up occurred at 6 months, 5 years, and 14 years. Response rates were 93.0%, 72.5%, and 71.8%. Participants were allowed to leave and reenter the study. Participants were categorized as always, intermittent, or never responders. Intermittent responders were categorized further as leavers (responded at least once before leaving the study) or returners (left the study before reentering).
RESULTS: Participants who always responded were older, more educated, married, Caucasian, and nonsmokers and had higher incomes. Intermittent responders shared similar baseline characteristics. Relative risk for being an intermittent responder was located between risks for always or never responding.
CONCLUSIONS: Participants who left and reentered the study had baseline characteristics similar to participants who responded at least once and then left the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16621597     DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2006.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  11 in total

1.  Predicting depressive and anxiety disorders with the YASR internalising scales (empirical and DSM-oriented).

Authors:  Kaeleen Dingle; Alexandra Clavarino; Gail M Williams; William Bor; Jake M Najman; Rosa Alati
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Who does not participate in a follow-up postal study? a survey of infertile couples treated by in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Penelope Troude; Estelle Bailly; Juliette Guibert; Jean Bouyer; Elise de La Rochebrochard
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Assessing generalisability through the use of disease registers: findings from a diabetes cohort study.

Authors:  Michael David; Robert Ware; Maria Donald; Rosa Alati
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Demographic and psychological predictors of panel attrition: evidence from the New Zealand attitudes and values study.

Authors:  Nicole Satherley; Petar Milojev; Lara M Greaves; Yanshu Huang; Danny Osborne; Joseph Bulbulia; Chris G Sibley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Factors relating to participation in follow-up to the 45 and up study in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal individuals.

Authors:  Lina Gubhaju; Emily Banks; Rona Macniven; Grace Joshy; Bridgette J McNamara; Adrian Bauman; Sandra J Eades
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  The association between perception of health during pregnancy and the risk of cardiovascular disease: a prospective study.

Authors:  Hanis Hanum Zulkifly; Alexandra Clavarino; Yaman Walid Kassab; Kaeleen Dingle
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-01-04

7.  Simple descriptive missing data indicators in longitudinal studies with attrition, intermittent missing data and a high number of follow-ups.

Authors:  Morten Wærsted; Taran Svenssen Børnick; Jos W R Twisk; Kaj Bo Veiersted
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-02-13

8.  Determinants of subject visit participation in a prospective cohort study of HTLV infection.

Authors:  Deborah A DeVita; Mary C White; Xin Zhao; Zhanna Kaidarova; Edward L Murphy
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Strategies for assessing the impact of loss to follow-up on estimates of neurodevelopmental impairment in a very preterm cohort at 2 years of age.

Authors:  Aurélie Piedvache; Stef van Buuren; Henrique Barros; Ana Isabel Ribeiro; Elizabeth Draper; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Do Participants With Different Patterns of Loss to Follow-Up Have Different Characteristics? A Multi-Wave Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Nargess Saiepour; Robert Ware; Jake Najman; Peter Baker; Alexandra Clavarino; Gail Williams
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.