Literature DB >> 16618862

Skin cancer examination teaching in US medical education.

Megan M Moore1, Alan C Geller, Zi Zhang, Benjamin B Hayes, Kendra Bergstrom, Julia E Graves, Andrea Kim, Juan-Carlos Martinez, Ladan Shahabi, Donald R Miller, Barbara A Gilchrest.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine physician preparation for performing the skin cancer examination (SCE).
DESIGN: We evaluated medical students' observation, training, and practice of the SCE; hours spent in a dermatology clinic; and self-reported skill level for the SCE by a self-administered survey. PARTICIPANTS: Graduating students at 7 US medical schools during the 2002-2003 academic year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentages of students reporting SCE skill observation, training, and practice.
RESULTS: Of 934 students, 659 (70.6%) completed surveys. Twenty-three percent of students had never observed an SCE, 26.7% had never been trained to perform an SCE, and 43.4% had never examined a patient for skin cancer. Only 28.2% rated themselves as somewhat or very skilled in the SCE. This rate dropped to 19.7% among 553 students who had not completed a dermatology elective. Compared with students without training, students who had been trained at least once in the SCE were 7 times more likely to rate themselves as being somewhat or very skilled in the SCE. Sixty-nine percent of students agreed that insufficient emphasis in their medical training was placed on learning about the SCE.
CONCLUSIONS: This survey documents the need for more consistent training of medical students in SCE. Even brief curricular additions would augment students' perceived skill levels and improve practice patterns and competencies of future physicians. More frequent and improved SCEs might result in earlier detection of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers by nondermatologists, with significant public health benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16618862     DOI: 10.1001/archderm.142.4.439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  16 in total

1.  A Clinical Aid for Detecting Skin Cancer: The Triage Amalgamated Dermoscopic Algorithm (TADA).

Authors:  T Rogers; M L Marino; S W Dusza; S Bajaj; R P Usatine; M A Marchetti; A A Marghoob
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 2.657

Review 2.  State of the science on prevention and screening to reduce melanoma incidence and mortality: The time is now.

Authors:  Mary K Tripp; Meg Watson; Sophie J Balk; Susan M Swetter; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 3.  Skin cancer education for primary care physicians: a systematic review of published evaluated interventions.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Goulart; Elizabeth A Quigley; Stephen Dusza; Sarah T Jewell; Gwen Alexander; Maryam M Asgari; Melody J Eide; Suzanne W Fletcher; Alan C Geller; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Martin A Weinstock; Allan C Halpern
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  A Pilot Educational Intervention to Support Primary Care Provider Performance of Skin Cancer Examinations.

Authors:  Kelly C Nelson; Elizabeth V Seiverling; Nadeen Gonna; Elizabeth Berry; Elizabeth Stoos; Chloe N Dorsey; Sarah Sepulveda; Gerardo Vazquez; Hung Q Doan; Lauren E Haydu
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 5.  Sensitivity and Specificity for Skin Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care Providers: a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis of Educational Interventions and Diagnostic Algorithms.

Authors:  Nadeen Gonna; Tiffaney Tran; Roland L Bassett; David P Farris; Kelly C Nelson
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 1.771

Review 6.  Screening and prevention measures for melanoma: is there a survival advantage?

Authors:  Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski; Suephy C Chen; Susan M Swetter
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Cancer prevention education in United States medical schools: how far have we come?

Authors:  Zeina Dajani; Alan C Geller
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Ambulatory melanoma care patterns in the United States.

Authors:  Andrew L Ji; Michael R Baze; Scott A Davis; Steven R Feldman; Alan B Fleischer
Journal:  J Skin Cancer       Date:  2013-08-21

Review 9.  Skin cancer screening: recommendations for data-driven screening guidelines and a review of the US Preventive Services Task Force controversy.

Authors:  Mariah M Johnson; Sancy A Leachman; Lisa G Aspinwall; Lee D Cranmer; Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski; Vernon K Sondak; Clara E Stemwedel; Susan M Swetter; John Vetto; Tawnya Bowles; Robert P Dellavalle; Larisa J Geskin; Douglas Grossman; Kenneth F Grossmann; Jason E Hawkes; Joanne M Jeter; Caroline C Kim; John M Kirkwood; Aaron R Mangold; Frank Meyskens; Michael E Ming; Kelly C Nelson; Michael Piepkorn; Brian P Pollack; June K Robinson; Arthur J Sober; Shannon Trotter; Suraj S Venna; Sanjiv Agarwala; Rhoda Alani; Bruce Averbook; Anna Bar; Mirna Becevic; Neil Box; William E Carson; Pamela B Cassidy; Suephy C Chen; Emily Y Chu; Darrel L Ellis; Laura K Ferris; David E Fisher; Kari Kendra; David H Lawson; Philip D Leming; Kim A Margolin; Svetomir Markovic; Mary C Martini; Debbie Miller; Debjani Sahni; William H Sharfman; Jennifer Stein; Alexander J Stratigos; Ahmad Tarhini; Matthew H Taylor; Oliver J Wisco; Michael K Wong
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2017-03-01

10.  Dermatology undergraduate skin cancer training: a disconnect between recommendations, clinical exposure and competence.

Authors:  R Benjamin Aldridge; Susanne S Maxwell; Jonathan L Rees
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.