PURPOSE: To evaluate two different techniques for whole-breast treatments delivered using the Hi-ART II tomotherapy device. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Tomotherapy uses the standard rotational helical delivery. Topotherapy uses a stationary gantry while delivering intensity-modulated treatments. CT scans from 5 breast cancer patients were used. The prescription dose was 50.4 Gy. RESULTS: On average, 99% of the target volume received 95% of prescribed dose with either technique. If treatment times are restricted to less than 9 min, the average percentage ipsilateral lung receiving > or =20 Gy was 22% for tomotherapy vs. 10% for topotherapy. The ipsilateral lung receiving > or =50.4 Gy was 4 cc for tomotherapy vs. 27 cc for topotherapy. The percentage of left ventricle receiving > or =30 Gy was 14% with tomotherapy vs. 4% for topotherapy. The average doses to the contralateral breast and lung were 0.6 and 0.8 Gy, respectively, for tomotherapy vs. 0.4 and 0.3 Gy for topotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Tomotherapy provides improved target dose homogeneity and conformality over topotherapy. If delivery times are restricted, topotherapy reduces the amount of heart and ipsilateral lung volumes receiving low doses. For whole-breast treatments, topotherapy is an efficient technique that achieves adequate target uniformity while maintaining low doses to sensitive structures.
PURPOSE: To evaluate two different techniques for whole-breast treatments delivered using the Hi-ART II tomotherapy device. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Tomotherapy uses the standard rotational helical delivery. Topotherapy uses a stationary gantry while delivering intensity-modulated treatments. CT scans from 5 breast cancerpatients were used. The prescription dose was 50.4 Gy. RESULTS: On average, 99% of the target volume received 95% of prescribed dose with either technique. If treatment times are restricted to less than 9 min, the average percentage ipsilateral lung receiving > or =20 Gy was 22% for tomotherapy vs. 10% for topotherapy. The ipsilateral lung receiving > or =50.4 Gy was 4 cc for tomotherapy vs. 27 cc for topotherapy. The percentage of left ventricle receiving > or =30 Gy was 14% with tomotherapy vs. 4% for topotherapy. The average doses to the contralateral breast and lung were 0.6 and 0.8 Gy, respectively, for tomotherapy vs. 0.4 and 0.3 Gy for topotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Tomotherapy provides improved target dose homogeneity and conformality over topotherapy. If delivery times are restricted, topotherapy reduces the amount of heart and ipsilateral lung volumes receiving low doses. For whole-breast treatments, topotherapy is an efficient technique that achieves adequate target uniformity while maintaining low doses to sensitive structures.
Authors: Yat Tsang; Laura Ciurlionis; Anna M Kirby; Imogen Locke; Karen Venables; John R Yarnold; Jenny Titley; Judith Bliss; Charlotte E Coles Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Hans Paul van der Laan; Wil V Dolsma; John H Maduro; Erik W Korevaar; Johannes A Langendijk Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 3.481