Literature DB >> 16618326

A liquid film-forming acrylate for peri-wound protection: a systematic review and meta-analysis (3M Cavilon no-sting barrier film).

Jan Schuren1, Anja Becker, R Gary Sibbald.   

Abstract

To undertake a systematic review of all reliable evaluations of the clinical performance and cost-effectiveness of a film-forming liquid acrylate in the protection of the chronic ulcer peri-wound skin. Results from searches were scrutinised by two reviewers to identify possible randomised controlled trials and full reports of these were obtained. Details of eligible studies were extracted and summarised independently by two reviewers using a data extraction sheet. Meta-analysis was used to combine the results of trials where the interventions and outcome measures were sufficiently similar. A total of nine eligible studies were identified. The review reveals that a liquid-film forming acrylate (Cavilon no-sting barrier film, 3M, Minneapolis, MN, USA) is a safe and effective skin barrier to protect the peri-wound area of chronic ulcers. There is no difference between the protective properties of different barrier methods that are used to protect the peri-wound skin around chronic ulcers. Compared with no treatment or a placebo, this liquid film-forming acrylate has a significant impact on the integrity of the peri-wound skin. In addition, it has significant benefits in terms of pain control and patient comfort, and its use may reduce nursing time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16618326      PMCID: PMC7951666          DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4801.2005.00131.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  11 in total

Review 1.  Preparing the wound bed 2003: focus on infection and inflammation.

Authors:  R Gary Sibbald; Heather Orsted; Gregory S Schultz; Patricia Coutts; David Keast
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig.

Authors:  G D WINTER
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1962-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Comparison of two peri-wound skin protectants in venous leg ulcers: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J Cameron; D Hoffman; J Wilson; G Cherry
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.072

4.  Film subjects win the day.

Authors:  S Hampton
Journal:  Nurs Times       Date:  1998 Jun 17-23

5.  A comparison of an alcohol-based and a siloxane-based peri-wound skin protectant.

Authors:  B S Rolstad; K Borchert; S Magnan; N Scheel
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  1994-11-02       Impact factor: 2.072

6.  Comparing cost per use of 3M Cavilon No Sting Barrier Film with zinc oxide oil in incontinent patients.

Authors:  H Baatenburg de Jong; H Admiraal
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.072

7.  The benefits of implementing a new skin care protocol in nursing homes.

Authors:  Sue Bale; Nicola Tebble; Vanessa Jones; Patricia Price
Journal:  J Tissue Viability       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.932

Review 8.  Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults.

Authors:  J N Gibson; H H Handoll; R Madhok
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002

Review 9.  Intact skin--an integrity not to be lost.

Authors:  R Gary Sibbald; Karen Campbell; Patricia Coutts; Douglas Queen
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  The protective effects of a new preparation on wound edges.

Authors:  K-D Neander; F Hesse
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.072

View more
  11 in total

1.  The Use of a No-sting Barrier Film Treatment Protocol Compared to Routine Clinical Care for the Treatment of Stage 1 and 2 Pressure Injuries in Long-term Care.

Authors:  Adrian Chan; Henry Yu-Hin Siu
Journal:  J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec       Date:  2016-11-17

Review 2.  Care of chronic wounds in palliative care and end-of-life patients.

Authors:  Christine A Chrisman
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  A laboratory comparison between two liquid skin barrier products.

Authors:  Kevin Y Woo; Debashish Chakravarthy
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Effect of a water-based no-sting, protective barrier formulation and a solvent-containing similar formulation on skin protection from medical adhesive trauma.

Authors:  Ronald J Shannon; Debashish Chakravarthy
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Evaluation of clinical and financial outcomes of a new no-sting barrier film and barrier cream in a large UK primary care organisation.

Authors:  Jackie Stephen-Haynes; Claire Stephens
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 6.  Challenging passivity in venous leg ulcer care - the ABC model of management.

Authors:  Keith Harding
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 7.  Health economic benefits of cyanoacrylate skin protectants in the management of superficial skin lesions.

Authors:  Kevin Y Woo
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 8.  Seeking effective interventions to treat complex wounds: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Jesmin Antony; Afshin Vafaei; Paul A Khan; Alana Harrington; Elise Cogo; Charlotte Wilson; Laure Perrier; Wing Hui; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 9.  Management of Moisture-Associated Skin Damage: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kevin Y Woo; Dimitri Beeckman; Debashish Chakravarthy
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.347

Review 10.  Protecting the radiation-damaged skin from friction: a mini review.

Authors:  Patries M Herst
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.